Agenda - Council - 01/24/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CASE FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT ~PPROVAL OF NORTHFORK OAKS 2ND ADDITION; CASE OF NORTH FORK, INC. By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik Background: North Fork, lac. is requesting preliminary plat approval of another portion of the Northfork P.U.D. locatediin the northeast corner of the property. The plat is to be named North:fork Oaks 2nd Addition arid consists of 73 acres proposed to be platted into 37 single family lots. The following items are enclosed for your information: a) b) c) xposedlocarion map preliminary plat and grading plan ~ity Staff review letter dated December 28, 1994 Observations: With the plartin~ of Northfo~ Oaks 2nd Addition, the number of lots will be within the 292 overall approved in the May, 1990 modifications to the P.U.D. Ail of the lots meet the one acre mum lot size. The lots are prol~sed to receive public access from the extension of Royal Road from the south and 162nd from ~e west. There are two cut-de-sacs that will extend off of Royal Road that do not exceed the 600 fbot rmximum length standard. In accordance With the May 9, 1989 Northfork Park Dedication Agreement, there is no park deification due off, this ar~ of the PUD. A pedestrian tra~ sportation link is required to connect the trails in Northfork with those in Woodlawn Esmu~s to the East, The City is requiring that the developer rough grade this i/nk in a location that gendrally follows the rear yards of lots 5 through I3 of Block 2. A Gra_rting and EYfajna_' ge Plan has been provided which is generally acceptable and at the dare of this writing, th~ final details of that plan are being incorporated in accordance with the recommendationg1 of the City Engineer. An erosion control plan needs to be provided. Soils data has been superir~,posed onto the preliminary plat and is acceptable. A Tree Preservation and Planting Plan also, needs to be provided as an addendum to the grading plan, It is est/mated tt~t~ t Lots 16 through 21 of Block 2 abut Armstrong Kennels. In response to concerns expressional by Charles Delaney during the platting of Northfork Oaks Add,it/on, Mr. Delaney and North Pork, Inc. came to an agreement wherein any lots abutting Armstrong Kennels are restric~red fro~ any clear-cutting within 75 feet of the common property line and all buyers are put on notice of ~e existence and related activities at Armstrong Kennels. Mr. Delaney has provided City Staff with evidence that he is agreeabe .to .a similar agreement for the ptat of North_fork Oaks 2~d Addition, However, Lot 20 of Block 2-is configured in such a way that a 75 foot buffer area s~bstant/ally restricts the devetopabitity and use of the tot. Mr. ]:)cia.ney is currently out of th~ state and Mr. Peck of North Fork, Inc, has 'been negotiating by phone and mail for a shared bufferlzone for Lot 20 by the two property owners involved. The Planning Comlnission conducted a preliminary plat public hearing on January 3 and theTe were no verbal comment submil:teck