Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CASE # / <br /> <br />REVIEW~12/31/94 UNAUDITED GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL REPORT <br /> By: Jessie Hart, Finance Officer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Attached for review is the December 31, 1994 Unaudited General Fund Financial Report. While <br />this informatio~ is being presented as "unaudited", the annual audit of the City is currently <br />underway and f~w, if any, changes will be made to the attached information. <br /> <br />The Actual Y T;D 1994 column reflects all activity for 1994, including accruals for receivables <br />and payables ~ of the end of the year. The Budget 1994 column reflects the Adopted 1994 <br />General Fund B~dget with several changes reflective of budget amendments adopted during 1994 <br />and other budge[ amendments which will be recommended by resolution at a meeting in the near <br />future, based on iaetual 1994 activity. <br /> <br />The unaudited ~al excess of revenues over expenditures for 1994 totaled $74,446. This excess <br />was the result or,several things including revenues in excess of budget and expenditures being less <br />than budget. Eac~h of these areas are detailed on the attached repons and discussed in more detail in <br />this case. r <br /> <br />Total revenues, exclusive of transfers in from other funds, for the General Fund in 1994 were <br />$2,870,553 eoml}ared to a budget of $2,725,157. The $144,670 excess of actual over budget was <br />due primarily to ~e increase in actual building permits and related revenues compared to budgeted <br />amounts. While Isome other areas were over compared to budget, such as interest earnings, other <br />areas were undex~ such as court fines. <br /> <br />Expenditures <br />Total expenditures, exclusive of transfers out to other funds, for the General Fundin 1994 were <br />$2,373,351 comgared to a budget of $2,581,840. This underage was the result of several factors, <br />including significantly lower workers' compensation and general liability insurance premiums,, the <br />street maintenanc~ program which was somewhat lower than budgeted, and the prudent nature that <br />departmental bu4gets were monitored during the year. Most departmental budgets were under <br />100% for the ye~, and where they exceeded the budgeted amount, there is generally a revenue <br />source that was over to cover the overage in expenditures. <br /> <br />_Transfers From arid To Other Ftlnds · <br /> <br />Transfers from ~her funds consiSt primarily of revenues from other funds that offset costs <br />budgeted from tlie General Fund. These include administrative transfers from the Enterprise <br />Funds, a transfer [rom the Equipment Replacement Fund for funding equipment, a transfer from <br />the PIR Fund to cfffset the City's share of the annual street maintenance program, and a transfer <br />from the Landfill Abatement Fund for the costs of the Environmental Speciahst. <br /> <br />Transfers to othev' funds consist primarily of a transfer to the Equipment Replacement Fund for <br />future funding anti a transfer to the Public Facilities Construction Fund for the purchase of the <br />Jaspar Street facilities. While this last transfer was not budgeted, it was necessary to show it in <br />this manner since _the proceeds of the inter-fund loan, the actual loan, and all future loan payments <br />are recognized in the General Fund. <br /> <br /> <br />