Agenda - Council - 03/28/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I '1 I I I I I I I I I I I Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beahen and Zimmerman.: Voting No: None. Case #5: · Request for Final Plat Approval of Putter's Field, a Minor : Subdivision; Case of Rich Kerner Zoning Administrator Frolik stated that Mr. Rich Kerner is requesting a minor subdivision to reclassify 0utlot B, Brook View Estates, from an ouflot to a buildable lot and block. Staff is of the opinion that this property was erroneously designated as an outlot. She added that pa;'k dedication will consist of a cash payment. Following review of the plat, the Planning¢ommission recommended final plat approval. Councilmember Beyer arrived. Motion by C°uncilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to adopt Resolution//0~-02-039 granting final plat approval to Putter's Field. Motion carriegl. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beahen and Zimmerman. Woting No: None. Abstain: Councilmember Beyer - because she arrived following disct~ssion of the case. Case #6: ,Request for Final Plat Approval of Northfork Moors Addition, a Minor Subdivision; Case of North Fork, Inc. Zoning Admin|strator Frolik stated that North Fork, Inc. is requesting a minor subdivision to facilitate sirr~le identification of areas to be conveyed to the homeowners association for open space, a~eas to be conveyed to the City for parks/trails, and areas for future development. She explained that Outlots A, C, D and E would be retained by North Fork for future development. Outlot B would be conveyed to the North Fork homeowners association for ~pen space. Park 1 and Park 2 would be dedicated to the City for park and trail purposes. ~ltaff recommended that North Fork be required to submit topos but staking comers of the p~k would be acceptable. Councilmember~Zimmerman inquired if Mr. Peck had topos done in the past. Mr. Dennis Pe{k, representing North Fork, stated that they have had some pretty good topos and he docs not feel it's necessary to reshoot everything. Councilmembe~ Peterson stated that normally an outlot is unbuildable and inquired if Outlots A,C,D, ~nd E are unbuildable. Mr. Peck stated they are unbuildable until further platted. Councilmember ~Beyer reported that in the past, outlot usually meant the property was unbuildable due to high water. Ms. Frolik stated~ outlots are determined unbuildable because of high water or proper platting procedure. Councilmember gimmerman suggested Staff come back with a recommendation of how to identify/classify Outlots. City Council/February 28, 1995 Page 5 of 14