My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/25/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1995
>
Agenda - Council - 04/25/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:37:18 PM
Creation date
9/26/2003 10:50:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/25/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
$ <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br /> City Staff recommends that the trail on the west side of the lake be shown as an on-road <br /> :trail and the eastern portion of that trail system would be concurrent with subdivision <br /> ~¢velopment. In the interim, the eastern portion of the trail should be redrawn so as not to <br /> imply that the City will be condemning homes for trail alignment. The consultants will also <br /> be insmacted to make sum the Kurak property lines show up clearly on the Parks and Trails <br /> map. <br /> <br /> Opposition was expressed regarding the elimination of a Mississippi River <br /> -Bridge crossing in general. Comments were submitted to the affect that the <br /> 'no bridge' approach was in fact endorsing the eastern alignment and for <br /> various reasons, Council should amend the transportation element with a <br /> western bridge alignment. Comments were submitted in support of the <br /> eastern bridge alignment. Council was requested to finally make a decision <br />-on the eastern bridge alignment and if it is to be eliminated, Anoka County <br /> Parks should be notified that the Jerry Martin's property (Tooth Acres) is <br /> no longer slated for a bridge and commercial development. In <br /> consideration of his 20 years of cooperation with Ramsey and Anoka <br /> County, Jerry Martin requested that if the eastern bridge alignment is <br /> eliminated, that a service road from the east into Tooth Acres be planned <br />-and it should be aligned adjacent to the highway as frontage parcels <br /> separating the highway and the service road detract from the use value. <br /> <br /> Staff Response and Recommendation: Mn/DOT, Anoka and Hennepin Counties, the City <br /> of Dayton and neighboring cities are all players in this discussion. Council movement to <br />- direct that a corridor be placed somewhere between Ramsey Blvd. and Puma Street seems <br /> to be the right approach so long as options are only eliminated after further study by all <br /> parties. <br /> <br /> It was suggested that the City reconsider the proposal to plan for a Rum <br /> River bridge crossing corridor through the Boy Scout Camp. <br /> <br /> Staff Response and Recommendation: A Boy Scout Camp bridge alignment and trail <br />: corridor should be removed from the map. Instead, narrative should be added to the <br /> comprehensive plan amendment directing that a corridor be identified in concert with the <br /> City of Andover somewhere along the Rum River. A Rum River bridge corridor would be <br /> moot if traffic congestion from T.H. #47 were redirected to 7th Avenue. <br /> <br />The thoroughfare plan needs to address some relief for the congestion on <br />Hwy. #47. <br /> <br />Staff'Response and Recommendation: The C.S.A.H. #116/T.H. #47 intersection will be <br />upgraded by MnDOT/Anoka County within the 1995/1996 time frame. The City has <br />budgeted for a corridor study for 1995 and set aside $300,000 in the 1998 CIP for corridor <br />improvements. The Willow Ridge subdivision will result in corridor improvements at <br />149th and the Road and Bridge Committee has proposed a transportation impact fee for <br />County/State system improvements necessitated by future subdivisions. The <br />Comprehensive Plan should support these measures. The plan should also request that <br />MnDOT/Anoka County address safety improvements to the corridor. <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.