Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />That by Sta~ Statute, the Applicant's proposal is considered a multifamily use in a single <br />family distr(et. <br /> ? <br />That the subject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential or single family zoning. <br /> <br />That on Ma~ch 7, 1995, the Planning Commission called the public hearing to order in an <br />attempt to r~eive public input on the issue, when a positive City action in fact will result in <br />a spot rezon~g. <br /> <br />That to locate a multi-family use in a single family district is not permitted by the <br />Conditional Use Permit process as this is a re-zoning issue. <br />That a multi'family use is not compatible in a single family residential zone. <br /> <br />That permitting a multi-family use in a single family residential zone is not consistent with <br />the intent athd purposes of the City's Zoning Chapter and is not harmonious with the <br />objectives ot~ the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />That the City has not permitted other multi-family units in a single family residential zone <br />since 1976 ~d that there are no provisions in City ordinances for multi-family uses without <br />city sewer a~d water. <br /> <br />The motion for the ~adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> [ <br /> <br />and the following v~ed against the same: <br />and the following abStained: <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly adopted by the Ramsey City Council this the <br />of ., 1~995. <br /> <br />day <br /> <br />A'ITEST: <br /> <br />Chairman <br /> <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />/77 <br /> <br /> <br />