My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/25/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1995
>
Agenda - Council - 04/25/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:37:18 PM
Creation date
9/26/2003 10:50:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/25/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The City should immediately require common bury for utilities in the road right-of-way. <br />a) The net benefit is less boulevard and tree root zone disruption by trenchers and, less <br /> topsoil lost from trenching. In some cases, there may also be less erosion on to <br /> streets. <br /> <br />-On non-thoroughfare streets with adequate off-street parking, street widths and right-of- <br />ways can be reduced to everyone's benefit. <br />-a) In areas of concern, the developers could place covenants on lots, requiring <br /> minimum garage or driveway spaces. <br /> <br />!b) Common bury for utilities requires less space, resulting in somewhat less boulevard <br /> need. <br /> <br />~More than one front yard tree should be required by the City. <br /> As long as the builders are aware before lot purchase, reasonable reforestation costs <br /> are not an issue. <br /> <br />The City should immediately require two front yard trees for certificate of <br />occupancy. In cases where no front yard tree(s) is necessary or desired, cash <br />(perhaps less than typical tree costs) could be provided to the City to insure <br />reforestation occurs in the benefitting area. <br /> <br />The City should continue to look for ways to encourage reforestation by homeowners, not <br />just developers/builders. <br />a) Tree planting programs organized at the neighborhood level are important <br /> community development endeavors, resulting in benefits beyond simple <br /> reforestation. <br /> <br />/ b) <br /> <br />Reforestation involving homeowners is more likely to meet their individual visions <br />and may stimulate additional local stewardship, <br /> <br />The process proposed for implementing the above recommendations would be for Staff to bring <br />the issues to City Council in policy form for affirmation and/or comment early this spring. <br />Ordinance revision may not be as urgent if the aforementioned improvements are effected. Moving <br />slower on the actual tree conservation ordinance offers adequate time for comment by all parties, <br />maximum flexibility, and provides the opportunity to gauge the effectiveness of the improved <br />procedures. <br /> <br />As always, please let me know if you require additional information. <br /> <br /> ? <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.