Laserfiche WebLink
$~H ~4 '95 00:~ R~HD~LL DEHHGOODRICH <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM <br />RE: <br />DATE <br /> <br />an Schroeder, Ramsey City Administrator <br /> omas H. Pertler, Assistant City Attorney <br />indemere Woods <br /> anna. fy 19, 1995 <br /> <br /> It is my u~erstanding the City has requested an opinion regarding <br /> what, if ~ny, obligation the city would have in enforcing an <br /> ,'informati~nal handout" provided by the developer to potential <br /> homeownersJ I will not address the issue of a municipality's <br /> I obligation ~o private restrictions or covenants because as <br /> . enforce <br /> you know, ~_his is not a City's legal requirement. Also, I have <br /> reviewed t~e development agreement between the City of Ramsey and <br />· the Windemgre Woods developer and do not find any development <br />'· agreement ~hat has been breached with the exception of those <br /> requiremen~.s deal lng with curb, gutter and/or driveway <br />, requirements. <br /> <br /> In revlewln~ the attached "informational handout" it obviously does <br /> not meet ~he legal' requirements for a recorded, restrictive <br />, ~ covenant e~forceable as against all lot purchasers and subsequent <br /> home-owner~. Of course, individual purchase agreements may have <br /> requirement~ that survive closing but the purchase agreements are <br /> i . not available for review. <br /> Apparently, i some homeowners in the Windemere Woods Development have <br /> taken the ~osition that the "informational handout" created some <br /> Itype of restriction on the lots in Blocks I through 4 of Windemere <br /> Woods. Th~. alleged restriction would require each house to have <br /> certain mir~imum aesthetic and structural requirements. Of those <br /> · requirementS, there is a requirement that each house have either: <br /> (1) a thre~ car garage, or (2) some brick on the front of the <br /> house. ThiS requirement is purportedly the one that homeowners in <br /> the development are concerned about for the existing home at Lot <br /> I 3, Block 3.- <br /> <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />Initially ~ is important to note that the alleged restriction <br />referred to, on the "informational handout" is not recorded with <br />the Anoka COunty Recorder's Office. In this regard, Minn. Stat. <br />§507.34 sta~es: <br /> <br /> "Everyrconveyance of real estates hall be recorded in the <br /> office~of the county recorder of the county where such <br /> real e~tate is situated; and every such conveyance not <br /> so rec$~rded shall be void as against any $~bsequent <br /> purchaser in good faith and for a valuable consideration <br /> of th~ same real estate, or any part thereof, whose <br /> conveyance is first duly recorded, . . ." <br /> <br /> <br />