Agenda - Council - 05/23/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I REQUEST FOIi CASE # ~ FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF DEAL INDUSTRIAL PARK, A MINOR SUBDIVISION; CASE OF JIM DEAL By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik Background: Jim Deal has appliex~ for a minor subdivision to plat property on Hwy. #10 into 3 commercial lots and one outlot for fu ~'ure development. Notification' I City Code does not ri~quire a public hearing for minor subdivisions. However, the adjacent parcel to the east is a non-~onforming residence. Staff has provided the property owner, Ed Hamilton, with a copy of the C6uncil case. Observations: City Code defines a construciton. The rr they recommended tt 3 as one lot. Because because no park dedJ count toward the 3 lc minor subdivision as a plat containing 3 lots or less that requires no road ~inor subdvision was reviewed by the Planning Commission on May 2 and iat to meet the restriction of 3 lots or less, the developer plat Outlot A and Lot outlots are considered undevelopable until such time as they are replatted and cation is collected on outlots, Staff is of the opinion that the outlot does not ;s allowed to be mated under a minor subdivision. Because the developer is unsure of when deve,opment will occur on the outlot, he desires not to incorporate the outlot into Lot 3 because the a[~sessed valuation and resulting property tax will be greater on one large developed lot than ills on one developed lot and one outlot. In addition, the developer could follow the directive bf the Planning Commission and plat 3 lots now and as soon as that was approved, he could a/pply for another minor subidivision to plat Lot 3 into one lot and one outlot and achieve thesamei~end he was attempting with this particular application. The developer is proposing to retain the two existing accesses onto Hwy. #10 and Lots 2 and 3 would be served by aidrive/parking lane running parallel with Hwy. #10 from the outlot on the east to Lot 1 on the west. [ The review and recommendations of Mn/DOT have been solicited and any plat approval should ibc contingent upon compliance with those recommendations. City Staff is also recommending tat a 40 foot wide outlot or drainage and utility easement be platted along the northern boundary o? the plat for future development as a service road in. the event Mn/DOT purchases access rights onto Hwy. #10. This outlot or drainage easement will also facilitate a utility easement for ~ extension municipal utilities. The existing non-conforming building on the property will be demolished. The Park Commissic~n reviewed the plat on May 11 and recommended that park dedication be satisfied with a cash l~ayment. The following items are enclosed for your information: a) b) c) d) e) Site lo~ation map PropoSed subdivision City S ~iaff review letter dated April 25, 1995 PropoSed resolution for f'mal plat approval PropoSed development agreement lo.%