Agenda - Council - 05/23/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~4/26×~5 ayor and City Council ollector Streets Policy NO. 339 .--3- October 7, 1985 Under our alternate, this would be the dharge if we off- set all of the non-residential collector street costs by area charges. However, as you will recall, we pro- posed to offset part of the costs by permit fees. If we assumed a 9000 square foot lot, this is about 0.21 acres: 0.21 Acres Lo------~-- x $2310/Net Acre - $485/Lot Under our alternate, this $485/Lot would be the charge if we offset all of the non-residential collector street costs by permit fees. I think that Council felt this was too high. Thus we need to strike a balance. Here are some possibilities: Permit Fee Area Charge (Based on 9000 Combination (Per Net Acre~) Square Feet)__ 1 2,310 -0- 2 2,070 50 3 1,8'25 10O ~ .1,585 150 S 1,340 200 6 1,100 250 7 1,000 270 8 86'0 300 9 615 350 10 375 400 11 130 450 12 -0- 485 No plan is perfect. I suppos~ we could be criticized in the following areas for using this approach: * Not every development will have a collector street. Thus we are treating some developments a little differently than others.. This idea is really somewhat of a compromise towards what Lakeville, as an example, does. Still, as was discusse4 in the 9/23 memo, a collector street does offer some geometric benefits to a development eve~--~ they are not allowed to access it. I I I I I i I I I I