Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />DATE <br /> <br />Ryan Schroeder, Ramsey City Administrator <br />Thomas H. Pertler, Assistant city Attorney <br />Windemere Woods <br />January 19, 1995 <br /> <br />It is my understanding the City has requested an opinion regarding <br />what, if any, obligation the City would have in enforcing an <br />"informational handout" provided by the developer to potential <br />homeowners. I will not address the issue of a municipality's <br />obligation to enforce private restrictions or covenants because as <br />you know, this is not a City's legal req~/irement. Also, I have <br />reviewed the development agreement between the City of Ramsey and <br />the Windemere Woods developer and do not find any development <br />agreement that has been breached with the exception of those <br />reqUirements dealing with curb, gutter and/or driveway <br />requirements. <br /> <br />In reviewing the attached "informational handout" it obviously does <br />not meet the legal requirements for a recorded, restrictive <br />covenant enforceable as against all lot purchasers and subsequent <br />home-owners. Of course, individual purchase agreements may have <br />requirements that survive closing but the purchase agreements are <br />not available for review. <br /> <br />Apparently, some homeowners in the Windemere Woods Development have <br />taken the position that the "informational handout" created some <br />type of restriction on the lots in Blocks i through 4 of Windemere <br />Woods. The alleged restriction would require each house to have <br />certain minimum aesthetic and structural requirements. Of those <br />requirements, there is a requirement that each house have either: <br />(1) a three car garage, or (2) some brick on the front of the <br />house. This requirement is purportedly the one that homeowners in <br />the-development are concerned about for the existing home at Lot <br />3, Block 3. <br /> <br />Initially it is important to note that the alleged restriction <br />referred to on t~e "informational handout" is not recorded with <br />the~Anoka County Recorder's Office. In this regard, Minn. Stat. <br />§507.34 states: <br /> <br /> ~ "Every conveyance of real estate shall be recorded in the <br /> ~ office of the county recorder of the county where such <br /> real estate is situated; and every such conveyance not <br /> ~ so recorded shall be void as against any subsequent <br /> purchaser in good faith and for a valuable consideration <br /> of the same real estate, or any part thereof, whose <br /> conveyance is first duly recorded, . . ." <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />