Agenda - Council - 06/13/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I '1 I I I I I I I I I I ~ introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: Councilmember ~ RESOLUTION g95-06-_ RESOLUTION !RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVE~/IENT PROJECT g95-14 (MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER ~XTENSION TO HAUBRICH ADDITION) WHERE/iS, pursuant to a resolution of the Ramsey City Council, adopted April 25, 1995, a report ha{- been prepared by Mr. Steven Jankowski, City Engineer, with reference to Improvement Project g95-14 (Municipal Sanitary Sewer and Water Extension to Haubrich Addition); and WHEREAS, the report was received by the Ramsey City Council on June 13, 1995 which indicates th{ following: Estimated Total Cost of Project $128,330 Estimated ~. (Individual PIb PIb PII~ PII~ PIb PIb 'omi Assessment Per Unit Property Cost) 23-32-25-42-0010 23-32-25-42-0008 23-32-25-42-0012 23-32-25-42-0009 23-32-25-42-0011 23-32-25-42-0007 $ 33,029 $ 31,460 $ 19,707 $ 36,977 $ 22,444 $ 22,44d Estimated .&nnual Assessment Per Unit (10-Year TO'm) PLN 23-32-25-42-0010 ~ 23-32-25-42-0008 23-32-25-42-0012 pP~ 23-32-25-42-0009 23-32-25-42-0011 PIN 23-32-25-42-0007 $ 5,608 $ 5,342 $ 3,346 $ 6,279 $ 3,811 $ 3,811 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAM~EY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1) That the R~nsey City Council will consider the improvements of sealcoating of such streets in aCcordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of fihe cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 and the Ramses) City Code Section 4.60 at an estimated total cost of $128,330. 2) That a public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the llth day of July, 1995 in the Council Chambers of the Ramsey Municipal Center at 7:00 p.m. and the City Administrator shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvem~t as required by law. The motion for the~adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following Voted against the same: