Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />project assessable costs and trunk eligible costs. On this project, the twelve-inch watermain is <br />considered a trunk i~provement. It is the policy of the City to charge the costs of an eight-inch <br />watermain as a lateral benefit to the project and the difference in cost between the eight-inch and <br />twelve-inch upsizing!to the City's trunk fund. <br /> <br />In addition to const~ction costs, Table 1 contains overhead costs in the amount of 30% of <br />construction costs, iOverhead costs include, but are not limited to engineering, construction <br />staking, inspection, fiscal, legal, administrative and contingency costs. An estimate of these costs <br />is as follows: ~ <br /> <br />Engineering 10% <br />Staki~ig and Inspection 7% <br />Fiscaliand Legal . 3% <br />Adrni~istration 5% <br />Contifigencies 5% <br />Total 30% <br /> <br /> TABLE 1 <br />ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS <br /> <br />Improvcmcn$ <br /> <br />Pro_iect A~sessabl0 <br /> <br />Project Construction Cost <br /> <br />Sanitary Sewer <br />Watermain* <br />Storm Sewer <br />Streets <br /> <br />$30,260 $30,260 <br />31,195 9,275 <br />12,490 12,490 <br />46.690 46.690 <br /> <br />Total Construction Cost 120,635 98,715 <br /> <br />Overhead @ 30% <br /> <br />36,191 29,615 <br /> <br />Total Project Cost 156,826 128,330 <br /> <br />* A twelve-inch wau <br />discussion above and <br /> <br />FINANCING <br /> <br />~rmain is anticipated to be in place prior to the project being undertaken. See <br />Appendix B. <br /> <br />Historically, in the City of Ramsey, total project costs have been divided equally among the total <br />number of benefitte~t lots. However, in this case, the total number of future lots is somewhat <br />uncertain. Although[ a future subdivision plan for the Haubrich Addition was prepared at the time <br />of platting, no develbpment constraints were placed on the location of individual homes. All but <br />one of the five existigg houses have been constructed over a proposed future lot line. In addition, <br />individual property ~wners may desire retaining larger than minimum lot width for their existing <br />dwelling or may choose not to subdivide their lot at all. For this reason, it is proposed that the total <br />project costs be divi~ed on a per front footage basis. A summary of each parcels cost are presented <br />in Table 2. In addition to the total project cost, each unit must contribute a uniform amount of <br />$1,539 into the sewer and water trunk funds which finance the oversizing of lateral sewer and <br />water lines. It should be noted that additional trunk assessments will be collected for each lot <br />created by any futur~ subdivisions. <br /> <br /> <br />