Agenda - Council - 06/27/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmembet, Zimmerman suggested passing this issue onto Council. He felt that this is a point that could take a couple of hours to discuss at a workshop. Mr. Jankowski Stated he would like some thoughts from the Council as to what the scope of the study shatiuld be, etc., and that thought be given to what the program would be like. Councilmembeir Zimmerman inquired about hiring consultants that would include the county and the Mate. Mr. Jankowski �ommented that the State really has to buy into what we want. The County does, to the effect that County Road #5 and #116 are in it. Councilmemberi Zimmerman stated that we know the financial participation will be nil. Mr. Schroeder 4ated he was just at a meeting with Bob Brown and Chuck Sigrud and they said we need to do something; Met Council was also involved. Councilmembet Zimmerman suggested "shipping this to the consultants and asking what we can get dono for $10,000 - knowing our primary concern is 153rd, but if we can, to go further. Councilmember'FBeahen agreed that we should go further if possible. Mr. Jankowski: suggested going up to 167th may not cost more. He added he would continue to work on the scope of the study. Case #1: bison Street Paving City Engineer J will be circula Avenue. He st project suggest paving, have N summarized the residence whict from Bison Stre onto Bison Stre parcel be consi( studies, perfon continued that reminded that it value of the pr( several thousano Parcels 3 and 4 would be eligib would combine here is whether 5 and 6 are bot] was specificall) The City has de; the Plat, needs this improveme? payment to the ( Dollars ($9,434 inkowski informed the Committee that he has been advised that a petition -d for the paving of the portion of Bison Street N.W., north of 171st ,ted that past history associated with previous feasibility studies for this hat several parcels, contiguous to the portion of Bison Street proposed for i challenges to the issue of whether or not they had been benefitted. He last feasibility study, illustrating the parcels in question. Parcel A has a has access onto 173rd Avenue (C.R. #63). The homestead is quite distant ;t, approximately 250 feet, and would not be likely to redirect its driveway t if it were paved. One past feasibility study for this project proposed this -red benefitted and assessed one -half a share. The most recent feasibility ied in 1993, did not consider this parcel benefitted. Mr. Jankowski ie had spoken with the City Attorney regarding this issue. He was making a determination, Section 429 limits an assessment to the increased perry. Since it is unlikely that this property would increase in value by dollars, as a result of paving, this lot should not be considered benefitted. ire owned by the same property owner and are both lots of record which D for a building permit. In previous public hearings, the owner stated he he two lots into a single property if the project were to proceed. The issue D consider these two parcels as one or two votes and assessments. Parcels parcels in the Dellwood Hills subdivision. The paving of Bison Street addressed in the development agreement for Dellwood Hills as follows: ?rmined that Bison Street Northwest, which is a street providing access to o be improved, including bituminous surfacing. The City is considering r as a special assessment project. The Developer agrees to make advance ity in the amount of Nine Thousand Four Hundred Thirty-four and 00 /100 90) which is the City Engineer's estimate of the benefit Lots 1 and 9 of the Road and Bridge Committee /April 25, 1995 Page 3 of 4 31