My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/27/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1995
>
Agenda - Council - 06/27/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:38:24 PM
Creation date
9/26/2003 11:33:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/27/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember ~Zimmerman stated he did understand. <br />Councilmembetl'Peterson inquired if Council felt that actions have allegedly occurred that <br />Mr. Gromberg seeds to be held accountable for. He inquired if Council felt that these <br />issues deal specifically with Mr. Gromberg. <br />Councilmember €Zimmerman felt that some things can only be answered by Mr. Gromberg. <br />Councilmember` Peterson inquired if it's Mr. Gromberg, or the comprehensive plan as a <br />whole. <br />Councilmember;Zimmerman stated that he perceives there'has been some screw -ups in the <br />process of this a6d he feels that Mr. Gromberg is at the heart of most of this. <br />Councilmember�Beyer agreed with Councilmember Zimmerman. She added that Council <br />was hearing co plaints on these kinds of things last year. She suggested it does not have <br />to be handled in closed meeting. <br />Councilmember'lPeterson stated he would vote for a closed meeting with AFSCME Union <br />representation and the City Attorney present. <br />Mayor Hardin in luired if Councilmember Peterson felt that should be done. <br />Councilmember Peterson responded if they can provide information, he should not have to <br />be here to take plbtshots. <br />Councilmember Beyer reminded Council of the malfeasance charge and suggested that Mr. <br />Gromberg should have a chance to speak to the charges. The attorney should. have a <br />chance to revievi them and the Union should be present too. <br />Mayor Hardin suggested that any one who has charges should give them, in writing, to the <br />City Administratpr and the City Attorney before a meeting. <br />Mr. Schroeder stated that if we follow that route, we will be closing this meeting and <br />reconvening again. <br />Councilmember; Peterson inquired "do we want to find out what went awry with the <br />comprehensive plan, or specifics on Mr. Gromberg ". If it is specifics with Mr. Gromberg, <br />he should be givin a chance to prepare a defense - it's the only fair thing for him. <br />Mayor Hardin inquired if Councilmember Peterson is talking about specific charges, not <br />cost estimates, ego. <br />Councilmember Peterson replied he is not talking about specific charges. <br />Councilmember �eahen inquired if that would satisfy the Planning Commission. <br />Councilmember Oeterson felt it would make them happy. <br />Councilmember I3eyer answered yes, it would make them happy. <br />Councilmember IPeterson wondered if there is a chance the City Attorney can say these <br />charges are unsuistantiated. People have to bring specific instances. <br />F (� 5 <br />City Council /May 10, 1995 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.