Laserfiche WebLink
'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br /> CODE ENFORCEMENT UPDATE <br />B~: Kendra Lindahl, Community Development Intern <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Council has reques ~t~l that Staff begin actively enforcing our residential ordinances. Therefore, the <br />City of Ramsey Sta~ff has been doing code enforcement sweeps throughout the City since April <br />1995. Generally, We have had an excellent compliance rate. Most violators correct the problem <br />within the three w~k time frame and their cases are dismissed. <br />On June 27, 199~., Staff brought some concerns to the Council about how the CUPs for <br />commercial vehicles would be handled. Staff felt that it was improper to continue to take CUP <br />application fees if i~here was no chance for Council approval of any application. A request was <br />made for Council ro look at either granting a grace period for everyone to get into compliance, <br />continuing with th~ CUP process, or rewriting the code. Council directed Staff to stop sending <br />letters to residents in violation of this ordinance until a decision was made on the ordinance. The <br />entire CUP application fee was refunded to residents who applied for a CUP to store commercial <br />vehicles on residential property, and all of the commercial vehicle cases were put on hold. I have <br />continued to log tl~e names and addresses of residents in violation of the commercial vehicle <br />ordinance, but hav~not sent any new letters. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />Staff has been doin', g code enforcement since April 1995. Council receives an updated spreadsheet <br />on a weekly basis tO show how the cases are progressing. <br /> <br />* 156 properties have been found in violation of City Ordinances <br />*9 cases ar~. being prosecuted by the City Attorney <br />*89 cases h~tve been dismissed due to the property coming into compliance with the code <br />*29 are stilli~n process <br />*6 of the ca[es were inspected on complaints and found to have no violation <br />*20 violatio~s of the commercial vehicle ordinance have been put on hold until the Council <br />reaches a de~ision about this ordinance. <br /> [ <br />*3 of the cases were cited for commercial vehicle violations, but the letter was never sent <br />because the iCouncil ordered that we stop citing violators. <br /> <br />Once the word got out that the Council was no longer enforcing this ordinance, at least two <br />residents, who had, removed their commercial vehicles from their property and had their cases <br />dismissed, moved t~eir commercial vehicles back onto their property. <br /> <br />Staff has continuedi to do code enforcement sweeps and make note of the properties in violation of <br />the commercial vehicle ordinance, but we have not been sending notices out to commercial vehicle <br />ordinance violators~ <br /> <br />Since the Ramsey Resident article came out to inform residents that we are now actively enforcing <br />our ordinances, I h~tve received a number of calls from residents. Some of the callers request more <br />information so they~ can get into compliance, but most of the calls are from residents who are glad <br />to see that we are lfinally enforcing our ordinances. Apparently people do not want to live in <br />neighborhoods wh~re junk cars or dump trucks are parked in the front yard, grass and weeds are <br />allowed to grow un[controlled, or the yards are full of debris. <br /> <br /> <br />