My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/25/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1995
>
Agenda - Council - 07/25/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:45:08 PM
Creation date
9/26/2003 12:07:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/25/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
412
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> : ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />2006 1st Avenue North, Suite 201 · Anoka, Minnesota 55303 <br />Telephone (612) 427-6267 <br /> Fax (612) 427-6920 <br /> <br />June 5, 1995 <br /> <br />Mr. Ryan Schroeder <br />Ramsey City Administrator <br />15153 Now~hen Boulevard <br />Ramsey, F~ 55303 <br /> <br />Robert W. Johnson <br />Stephen D. Johnson <br /> <br />RE: Rum River Hills Golf Course <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Schroeder: <br /> <br />Please be~advised that I represent Jerry Schmidt whose <br />residencel is located at 5831 164th Lane N.W., Ramsey, <br />immediately adjacent to the Rum River Hills Golf <br />Course. As you may be aware, the owners of the Rum <br />River Hills Golf Course are asking permission to build <br />a large m~intenance building and parking lot on the <br />golf course~abutting my client's property. <br /> <br />In reviewing the original PUD Plan and Developers <br />Agreement~ it appears that the zoning of the particular <br />property in question was never addressed; and the <br />property where the maintenance building is to be <br />located is zoned PUD Golf Course. I have also been <br />informed ~hat the Planning staff intends to allow the. <br />building .o be erected on the property simply with <br />site-plan!approval without a public hearing. <br /> <br />It is ouri position that a public hearing is required in <br />this matter. This proposed building was not included <br />in the original PUD Plan; will reduce the open space in <br />the PUD add contradicts the original Findings of Fact <br />that were~ entered into prior to the approval of the PUD <br />because this structure will have a severe detrimental <br />effect toI my client's property and the property of <br />other surrounding property owners and may be considered <br />an invers~ taking, by.the City. My client respectfully <br />requests ~hat this proposed project be put on for <br />public he~ring so that the concerns of the surrounding <br />property ~wners can be heard by the City Council. If <br />this matter is not placed on for public'hearing, my <br />client ha~ requested that I take whatever steps are <br />necessaryI in order to protect his interests. Please <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.