My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/25/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1995
>
Agenda - Council - 07/25/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:45:08 PM
Creation date
9/26/2003 12:07:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/25/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
412
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Neighborhood Com~atibili .ty: <br /> <br />The structure is a r.~ bler design with vinyl siding and fiberglass shingles. Aesthetically speaking, <br />the proposed structm', e is compatible with the existing home in Pineview Estates 2nd Addition and <br />the residential development on the north side of 149th. <br /> <br />.Access; <br /> <br />The Mertens have informed staff that the certificate of survey is in error; they are proposing that <br />their driveway be located on the east property line rather than the west. The covenants for <br />Pineview Estates 2fid Addition requires the Mertens to have a common driveway on the west <br />property line with l.~ot 7. The common driveways are to be 30 feet wide, 15 feet on each side of <br />the common properS, lines. (I believe the intent of the common driveway concept was to limit the <br />number of accesses! onto 149th because of the commercial traffic that would be associated with <br />them and a 30 fo~t wide driveway would be more accommodating to some of the larger <br />commercial vehicles that would be using these drives). Consistent with that, Lot 9 and 10 are <br />supposed to have a e:ommon driveway on their common lot line. <br /> <br />However, the vicinity of the common line between 9 and 10 is wetland and a common'driveway <br />wall not be feas~blei so Lot 10 wall have to have ~ts own driveway rather than a shared driveway <br />with lot 9. Mr. MeOens desires to have a tuck-under garage and the only way he can do that is if <br />he has a driveway coming in from the east. He has proposed to the Pineview Estates 2nd Addition <br />Homeowners Assoi:iation (Mike Shoquist and Gilbert Menkveld) to let Lot 10 have its own <br />driveway, he will hitve a shared driveway with Lot 9 to the east, and in the event Lot 7 develops <br />with a commercialiuse that needs the 30 foot wide driveway on the common property line as <br />originally planned ~or, he is willing to grant an easement for the additional 15 feet needed on his <br />side of the property ~line. Mr. Shoquist and Mr. Menlcveld have signed an agreement accepting Mr. <br />Merten's proposal., <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.