Agenda - Council - 07/25/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to accept #12 through #2I as presented. Motion by CommiSsioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to approve the Findings of Fact as amende& Motion carried, voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, and Holland. Voting No: Commissioner Hendriksen. Absent: Commissioners LaDue and Thom& Motion by CommiSsioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to recommend that City Council adopt the amended Findings of Fact relating to an amendment to the development plan for the Rum River Hilli PUD development agreement. Motion carried. V6ting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, and Holland. Voting No: Commissioner Hendriksen. Absent: Commissioners LaDue and Thomd. Motion by Commiisioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to recommend that City Council approve thl proposed amendment to the development plan for the Rum River Hills PUD to include a golf courge maintenance building. Motion carried. VOting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, and Holland. Voting No: Commissioner Hendriksen. Absent: Commissioners La.Due and Thorud. Commissioner Deemer stated he would like to consider a variance to the setback to the highway of not less than 20 fe6, t if Mr. Schmidt felt this might appease the situation, and Mr. Schmidt stated that 20 feet would make a considerable difference. Motion by CommiSSioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Holland to recommend that City Council grant site ~lan approval to the Rum River Hills golf course maintenance building based on discussion and contingent upon compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated June 14, 1995. Motion carried. VOting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Holland, and Terry. Voting No: Comrn~ssioner Hendriksen. Absent: Commissioners LaDue and Thomd. Case #2: Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Grading in Northfork Links; Case of North Fork, Inc. Zoning Administrator Frolik reported that on June 6, 1995, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing andireviewed the request. At that time it was noted that the grading project must also be reviewed by the Northfork Homeowners Association. Based on that, coupled with concerns expressed~.[ by residents and the City Engineer, the Planning Commission tabled action on the request until receipt of input from the Northfork Homeowners Association. The applicant met with the Architectural Review Committee of the Northfork Homeowners Association, and the Chairperson of tha~ committee, Bill Kingston, contacted Ms. Frolik with recommendations which she outlined in a memorandum to the Planning Commission dated July 5, 1995 (attached hereto as Exhibit B). Ms. Ffolik also noted that the applicant has also discussed drainage issues with the City Engineer. City Engineer SteVen Jankowski advised that North Fork, Inc. has submitted a revised drainage plan which proposes a large dry pond area in the northwest corner of the four parcels. He explained that this dry pond would only overflow at a 100-year event, and he finds this an adequate proposal, i Mr. Jankowski noted that them is an existing problem of flooding on Andrie Street from a point isouth of these catch basins, and an alternative solution needs to be pursued in order to address tMt situation also. Planning Commission/July 5, 1995 Page 5 of 13