My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/12/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1995
>
Agenda - Council - 09/12/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:47:08 PM
Creation date
9/26/2003 1:48:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/12/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />tanks from the public right-of-way, and constructing the building with an asphalt shingle <br />roof. ' <br /> <br />Jerry Schmidl. t, 5831 - 164th lane N.W., Ramsey, stated his home is directly south of the <br />proposed m[intenance building. He declared that they do not have an agreement on a site <br />plan nor have they ever been close to an agreement on the site plan and they will never <br />reach an agrllement with his blessing. The only reason he has talked to the owners of Rum <br />River Hills ~as on the matter of damage control. He stated he will not stay in his home if <br />this buildingtcomes in. He added he does not want to move but because they bought their <br />home on a golf course for recreational property, they cannot accept the building in that <br />location. He explained that he had done research on maintenance buildings and golf <br />courses and {presented pictures of where these courses have located their maintenance <br />buildings..Ij, e noted there are no maintenance buildings sitting behind someone's house. <br />He informed~Council that he had also contacted the National Golf Foundation which would <br />be a neutral l~arty. The information he received mentioned that one of the most neglected <br />phases of golf course planning is maintenance. He referred to a letter from the Rum River <br />Hills Board (~f Directors which was in response to a complaint he had registered pertaining <br />to the foul l~nguage he was subjected to from golfers on the course. The response stated <br />that this was one of the small inconveniences of living on a golf course which does add <br />aesthetics t~ one's home. Mr. Schmidt pointed out that this building would not be an <br />additional aesthetic. Getting back to the maintenance planning, the information he received <br />suggested thi~t for an 18-hole golf course, the maintenance facility should be 17,000 feet, <br />Rum River Bills is looking for a 3,500 square foot building which, in his opinion, shows <br /> f. <br />lack of planning. He figured they would have to come back to do a condemnation for <br />expansion arid he would end up losing his yard. Mr.'Schmidt suggested this location is not <br />their prime 4pot, it's the one that's the cheapest and meets with the least resistance. He <br />reported that~ one of the course owners has some property which would be ideal to put a <br />maintenanceibuilding on, plus another good spot is where it currently is. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik indicated she did not know there was such a list of unresolved issues; she <br />understood the only disagreement was about the roof. <br /> <br />Mr. Schmidt!responded by saying that he did not tell Ms. Frolik that they made a complete <br />agreement O.,ith the exception of the roof. He stated he was told by Jeff Tollette that an <br />asphalt roof',is $5,000. He reiterated that he did not tell Ms. Frolik that everything had <br />been resolved. He stated "I did not try to give you that feeling at all". <br /> <br />Jeff Tollett~, Manager of Rum River Hills Golf Course at 166th and Highway #47, <br />reported that{ they have been through this process with three meetings with the Planning <br />Commission}and numerous discussions with Mr. Schmidt. He added that Mr. Schmidt did <br />not even wagt to talk about it. Mr. Tollette reported that he had received a certified letter <br />from Mr. Sc.hmidt indicating that any more discussion would be considered harassment. <br />He continued that he has made some concessions to the original site plan and it was agreed <br />that they wo01d meet with staff, the builder and the residents. It was the consensus of the <br />five people Oresent at that meeting that the proposed location would be the best. On the <br />original site ialan the building was to be 55 feet from Mr. Schmidt's property line and 150 <br />feet from the!center line of Highway #47. The proposal now is to have the building 78 feet <br />from Mr. Sc§midt's property line plus they have added maple and pine trees for screening. <br />He added thst the proposal is also to change the doors to be on the west side. He stated <br />they could not agree to hours of operation and added that they have always had these same <br />hours and thdre should not be any activity change. Mr. Tollette explained that the proposed <br />maintenanceibuilding looks small but because of the mezzanine, they actually have double <br />the space. He commented that the building would have vinyl siding to match the club <br />house and pdinted out that due to a gas line, they cannot move the building any further. He <br />felt they had done as much as they possibly could do. <br /> <br />City Council/July 25, 1995 <br /> Page 7 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.