Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Perry stated that his fhrn reviews every aspect of the development to ensure there will <br />be no problem!down the road. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich ~uggested that would be the case for a large development of say 100 lots or <br />so, but in this" <br /> ~case, there are no problems anticipated and, therefore, no legal fees. He <br />reiterated that this property is already platted and zoned and these conditions do not warrant <br />legal fees. ~ <br /> <br />Mr. Perry again asked that Council not agree to this project. <br /> <br />John Haubrich_, 15156 Nowthen Boulevard N.W., Ramsey, stated that 100 feet of his <br />property "kind!of" belongs to the City - it's a drainage easement and cannot be built on. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski suggested that could be vacated. <br /> <br />Steve Croteau :5939 - 151 st Lane N.W., Ramsey, stated that his land was also encumbered <br />by a drainage 4asement. That cuts down on available land for development and he inquired <br />if there would be any compensation due to that. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski reported that the City is looking to put a retention pond on Mr. <br />Juskiewicz's p,topeny where the bulk of the drainage easement is. The lots are extra deep <br />and can aceom~n~, orate the drainage easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau iZ~quired about placing a shed in that area of his property and asked if that <br />drainage easement would prevent him from doing that. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowsld responded that the drainage easement itself now prevents him from being <br />able to do that.: <br /> <br />Jim Green, 5858 - 151st Lane N.W., Ramsey, stated that all kinds of figures have been <br />quoted this evening. He commented that he looked at land down by 147th and the lots <br />there were going for about $35,000 to $42,000 per City lot. They virtually have no back <br />yards and they~ are building $200,000 homes there. The lots in the Haubrich Addition are <br />much more desirable and $35,000 to $40,000 seems to be pretty much in line. He <br />suggested it is ifime to move ahead. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardiniinquired of Mr. Schroeder and Mr. Goodrich if they are "comfortable" with <br />the numbers iff~ the appraisal to which they replied in the affzrmative. <br /> <br />Motion by Cogncilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to adopt <br />Resolution g95-10-235 ordering Improvement Project g05-14 (Municipal sanitary sewer, <br />water extension, storm sewer, and street improvements to Haubrich Addition). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson and Beahen. <br />Voting No: C6uncilmembers Beyer and Zimmerman. <br /> <br />Case #2: [Water/Sewer Connection Requirements <br /> <br />City Administrator Schroeder stated that at the last meeting, Council briefly discussed <br />existing propekies receiving extensions to the water/sewer connection requirements. At <br />that time, Coqncil asked for some additional information. The Metropolitan Council's <br />policy is that Were be a two-year time frame for connection. The City of Elk River has a <br /> <br /> City Council/October 3, 1995 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />