Laserfiche WebLink
mber 30, 1995 <br /> <br />The Honorable James D. Gibbs <br />Chief Judge Tenth Judicial District <br />Anoka County Courthouse <br />320 East Main Street <br />Anoka, Minnesota 55303 <br /> <br />RE: City of Ramsey, Anoka County, Minnesota Charter Commission <br /> Annual Report <br /> <br />Dear Judge Gibbs: <br /> <br />In accordance with Minnesota Statute 410.05, the following is an annual report reflecting <br />the activities of the City of Ramsey Charter Commission during 1995. <br /> <br />The Commission met on the following dates: <br /> <br />January i9, I995 <br />April 20, 1995 <br />June 1, 1995 <br />November 30, 1995. <br /> <br />At the January 19 meeting, Charter reviewed the electoral process survey results. The <br />current Mayor and one of the mayoral candidates was present at the meeting to discuss the <br />survey. The Charter Commission determined that this same issue should be placed on the <br />next agenda to allow for more of the 1994 candidates to be present to talk about the <br />process. Charter reviewed the voting results from the past election. Another issue <br />discussed at that meeting was the sale of real property. The City Administrator updated <br />Charter on the process followed to sell City-owned property. Following discussion, <br />Charter tabled action with instructions to staff to try to give the Commission some <br />alternatives by adding language to protect residential areas and misuse of the right to buy <br />and sell property. <br /> <br />At the April meeting, the Commission again discussed the electoral process. One of the <br />council candidates from the 1994 election was in attendance to present his views on the <br />process. Primary elections, change in term lengths and campaigning practices were among <br />some of the topics discussed. A ward system versus at large Council was also discussed. <br />The Commission decided they would continue to discuss the pros and cons of each. The <br />sale of real property was discussed as was the fact that it has to be done via City ordinance. <br />It was determined that park property is protected plus it could be made a requirement that <br />no public sale take place without fa'st holding a public hearing. The <br /> <br /> <br />