Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Perry stat~, that his f'n-m reviews every aspect of the development to ensure there will <br />be no problem down the road. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich!suggested that would be the case for a large development of say IIX) lots or <br />so, but in thi~ case, there are no problems anticipated and, therefore, no legal fees. He <br />reiterated thatl;this property is already platted and zoned and these conditions do not warrant <br />legal fees. <br /> <br />Mr. Perry again asked that Council not agree to this project. <br /> <br />John HaubriOh, 15156 Nowthen Boulevard N.W., Ramsey, stated that 100 feet of his <br />property "kind of" belongs to the City - it's a drainage easement and cannot be built on. <br /> <br />City Engine. et Jankowski suggested that could be vacated. <br /> <br />Steve Croteaa~ 5939 - 151st Lane N.W., Ramsey, stated that his land was also encumbered <br />by a drainageieasement. That cuts down on available land for development and he inquired <br />if there would be any compensation due to that. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankow~;ki reported that the City is looking to put a retention pond on Mr. <br />Juskiewicz's ~roperty where the bulk of the drainage easement is. The lots are extra deep <br />and can accorj~modate the drainage easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau ~inquired about placing a shed in that area of his property and asked if that <br />drainage easoment would prevent him from doing that. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski responded that the drainage easement itself now prevents him from being <br />able to do that. <br /> <br />Jim Green, 5858 - 151st Lane N.W., Ramsey, stated that all kinds of figures have been <br />quoted this g~vening. He commented that he looked at land down by 147th and the lots <br />there were g~ing for about $35,000 to $42,000 per City lot. They virtually have no back <br />yards and they are building $200,000 homes there. The lots in the Haubfich Addition are <br />much more ~esirable and $35,000 to $40,000 seems to be pretty much in line. He <br />suggested it is time to move ahead. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin: inquired of Mr. Schroeder and Mr. Goodrich if they are "comfortable" with <br />the numbers in the appraisal to which they replied in the affu'mafive. <br /> <br />Motion by Gouncilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to adopt <br />Resolution ~5~10-235 ordering Improvement Project g95-14 (Municipal sanitary sewer, <br />water extension, storm sewer, and street improvements to Haubfich Addition). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson and Beahen. <br />Voting No: ~ouneilmembers Beyer and Zimmerman. <br /> <br />Case #2: Water/Sewer Connection Requirements <br /> <br />City Admin!strator Schroeder stated that at the last meeting, Council briefly discussed <br />existing properties receiving extensions to the water/sewer connection requirements. At <br />that time, U~ouncil asked for some additional information. The Metropolitan Council's <br />policy is that there be a two-year time frame for connection. The City of Elk River has a <br /> <br /> City Council/October 3, 1995 ~t.~\ <br /> ~ Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />