Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br />Mr. Carl Ohm <br />Mr. Jon Olson <br />August 8, 1994 <br />~age 8 <br /> <br />Screerdines at the Mississippi River bridges 19) TH 169 Bridge <br /> 20) TH 610 Bridge <br /> <br />~ order to reflect the future traffic volumes in the stud), area more <br />realistically, the plus or rrdnus difference between the 1990 ground and 1990 <br />modeled volumes were used to adjust the Year 2015 modeled volumes. In <br />most cases, as can be seen in Table 1, the 1990 ground and 1990 modeled <br />vblumes are similar. <br /> <br />k final adjustment was made to Year 2005 and Year 2015 traffic volumes <br />c~ossing the TH 169 bridge. Orig4~nal modeled volumes reflected a number of <br />v~kicles that could not be accommodated by the existLng or the future design <br />of the TH 169 bridge. This problem is a common occurrence in modeling <br />w~ere many roadways come together at one or two poLnts for a bridge <br />crossing. The adjustment was made by completing a select 1Ln.k analysis on the <br />TbI 169 bridge and redistributing ~affic based on the results of that analysis. <br />T~e analysis showed that 33 percent of traffic on the TH 169 bridge could be <br />re~tistributed, to either the TH 101 bridge to the northwest or the TH 610 <br />bSdge to the southeast. Of that 33 percent, 61 percent are projected to use the <br />TPI 610 bridge, and the remaining 39 percent a_re projected to use the TH 101 <br />bridge. Finally, traffic volumes from the TH 169 bridge were added or <br />stlbtracted on affected roadways. The results of the redistribution of TH 169 <br />br_idge traffic volumes present a more realistic view of travel behavior within <br />the study area. <br /> <br />Development of PM Design Hour Directional Traffic Volumes <br /> <br />Historical traffic volume data from Amoka Count3, and the Minnesota <br />Dqpartment of Transportation was used in developing PM desig'n hour <br />di~ect-ional volumes at the above-listed screenline locations. The factors used <br />fo~ calculating ADT volumes to PM desiv~n hour directional volumes are listed <br />below. <br /> <br /> TH 169 -- 15.2% desi~ hour factor (DHF), 65% westbound - 35% <br /> eastbound <br />2) TH 47 -- 9.77% DHF, 30% southbound - 70% northbound <br />3i 7th Avenue-- 8.66% DHF, 55% southbound - a=°'~o ~o northbound <br /> <br /> <br />