My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/12/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1995
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/12/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 12:26:26 PM
Creation date
9/29/2003 9:46:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/12/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Feb. 8, 1983 <br /> <br />BIKEWAYS <br /> <br />I III I <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />-23- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> J. AT-GRADE RAILRDAD CROSSINGS <br /> <br /> Whenever it is ne~ssary to cross railroad tracks <br />with a bikeway, special c~re must be taken to assure that <br />the safety of bicyclists is~protected. The bikeway crossing <br />should be at least as wid~ as the approaches of the bike- <br />way. Whenever possible, ~he crossing should be straight, <br />and at fight angles to Be rails. For on-road bikeways, <br />where a skew is unavoidable, the shoulder should be <br />widened, if possible, to p~rmit bicyclists to cross at fight <br />angles. (See Fig. [). Spekial construction and materials <br /> <br />should be considered to <br />width to a minimum. P <br />so ridge buildup does not <br />cases, t~nber plank cro~ <br />provide for a smoother crc <br />cannot be avoided, appr¢ <br />to warn bicyclists of the <br />it is also desirable to cro~ <br />not possible to cross at 90¢ <br /> <br />ikeep the flangeway depth and <br />.vement should be maintained, <br />occur next to the rails. In some <br />[nqs can be justified, and can <br />;sing. Where hazards to bicyclists <br />priate signs should be installed <br />danger. For off-road b/keways, <br />at 90°, see Fig. J. When it is <br />the bikeway should be widened <br /> <br />to allow the cyclist to trois at as close to 90° as possible, <br />see Fig. K. ~ <br /> <br />Roadway ~ <br /> <br />Large radii <br />desirable <br /> <br />Large radii <br />desirable <br /> <br /> Su'iped <br /> <br /> Widen to <br /> permit right <br /> angle crossing <br /> <br /> Large radii desirable <br /> <br /> !l Direction of <br /> bike travel <br /> <br /> Bikeway <br /> <br /> Shoulder <br /> <br />FIGURE I <br /> <br /> ? <br /> <br />Standard <br />curve <br />w/dening <br /> <br />Adc~tiona] <br />required <br /> <br />Bikeway <br /> <br />\ Standard <br /> curve <br /> widening <br /> <br />Adclidonal <br />RYW <br />required <br /> <br />Bikeway <br /> <br />Shoulder <br /> <br /> FIGURE J <br />CROSSING (Most Desirable) <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.