Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> <br />Feb. 8. <br /> <br /> This techniqu~ also has another application. <br />If intersection proves ~too difficult to route a bikeway <br />through it, a sign could be posted at end of stripe point <br />directing bicyclist to w~lk bike to next bike lane. In such <br />cases, it would be desirable if a sidewalk facility was avail. <br />able to make this connedtJon. <br /> <br /> G. ON.ROAD BIKEWAy TREATMENTS THROUGH <br /> INTERSECTION ~EATURES <br /> <br />BIKEWAYS <br /> <br />-33. <br /> <br /> Bicyclists should be encouraged to make left turns <br />by the two-step method if a double left turn lane is present. <br /> <br />5. Two-Way Continuous Left Turn Lane <br /> <br /> Bicyclists should be encouraged to make left turn <br />by the two-step method. <br /> <br />6. Bypass Lane at "T" and Four-Way Intersections <br /> <br /> 1. Right Turn Lanes <br /> <br /> Minnesota Stat~ law requires the bicyclist to keep <br />as close as practicable t~ the right-hand curb on edge of the <br />roadway. Therefore. tha bicyclist should be on the right <br />edge of the right turn la~,e. Th/s is not a desirable position. <br />especially if the bicyclis~ is intending to go straight ahead, <br />however, it is the safeit location. To accommodate the <br />bicyclist in the right nard lane, two methods are suggested: <br /> <br /> - For low volume Irigh,~ turn lanes <br /> Replace standag, d RIGHT TURN LANE" sign <br />(RS-X1) with "BEGIN I~IGHT TURN LANE YIELD TO <br />BIKES (R4-4). See Fig. D, <br /> <br /> - For high volumelright nam lane <br /> Channel the bi~ lane onto the sidewalk or off <br />road path and encoura~ bicyclists to behave as pedes- <br />trians at the intersection~ See Fig. E. Placement of a stop <br />sign for the cyclist at the crossing may cause confusion <br />for the motorist and should generally not be used except <br />for high traffic volumes i!both turning motorists and bi- <br />cycles). Bicyclists in an !intersection cross-walk are con. <br />sidered the same as a pedeltrian. <br /> <br /> 2. Channel/zed Free Turning Lanes <br /> <br /> Channelized "Frl~e" turning lanes pose problems <br />similar to the right turnin~ lanes. Recommended treatment <br />at free turning lanes is indicated on Figure F. This involves <br />the broken stripe treatment to encourage bicyclist weaving <br />to the proper position r~lative to turning traffic, and a <br />marked right-angle crossin~ to encourage bicyclists to make <br />a pedestrian-hke crossing ill they are unable or unwilling <br />to execute the weaving ~aneuver. For high speed turning <br />lanes, the technique ind,,c, ated on Figures G and H are <br />recommended. <br /> <br /> The use of a bypass lane encourages vehicles to <br />move around left turning vehicles. They present a problem <br />to the bicyclist using the shoulder of the roadway, because <br />usually the bypas~ lane uses what there is of the shoulder. <br /> <br /> When a bikeway is added to roadw, ay where <br />bypasses are in use, it is strongly recommended that at- <br />least a four foot shoulder be added to the bypass lane. <br />This additional width should also be striped to discourage <br />veh/cle encroachment/nto it. <br /> <br />H. OFF.ROAD BIKEWAYS AT INTERSECTIONS AND <br /> INDEPENDENT BIKEWAY CROSSING <br /> <br /> Off. road bikeways normally carry two.way traffic. <br />At intersections bicyclists face many of the same con- <br />flicts as they would if they were in a bike lane on the road- <br />way. The problems asscciated with the bikeways relate <br />largely to motorist expectation of entries to the crosswalk <br />area as pedestrian rather than typical bicycle travel speeds. <br />Also, two.way bikeways require one direction of crossing <br />to be done contrary to normal vehicle operation. Safety <br />with this type of crossing is dependent upon the bicyclist <br />adopting a more pedestrian-like yielding posture to motor <br />vehicles. <br /> <br />1. Treatment of Off-road Bikeways <br /> <br /> Bikeways which run parallel to the roadway <br />should be brought into the intersection to function like a <br />crosswalk. (See Fig. I). The reason for this is to take ad- <br />vantage of the intersection traffic control and to avoid <br />having the bicyclist passing between stopped vehicles <br />waiting for signals to change. At low volume cross streets, it <br />is acceptable to continue the parallel d/stance; however, the <br />crossing should be identified and bicychst must be required <br />to stop or yield before entering the roadway. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3. Right Turn on Red <br /> <br /> Where "right turn on red" is permitted, the focus <br />of right turning motorists ~oward cross traffic approaching <br />from the left is intensifie~. The straight through bicyclist <br />required to stop for the ~ed light may find that vehicles <br />turning right on red infrin~qe into their storage area. Signs <br />and mark/ngs along the bi~e lane can help to remind the <br />drivers of the bicyclist pre,ncc. <br /> <br /> 4. Double Left Turn ..~anes <br /> <br /> 2. Treatment of Off-road Bikeway at Independent <br />Crossings <br /> <br /> There is some evidence of high acddent experi- <br />ence in isolated intersections of independent facilities <br />with motor vehicle roadways. This appears to stem from <br />four factors: <br /> <br />- Failure to establish proper sight clearance zones. <br /> <br /> - Poor perception of or reaction to crossing signs <br />and markings. <br /> <br /> <br />