My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/09/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1995
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/09/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 12:26:41 PM
Creation date
9/29/2003 9:53:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/09/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case #3 <br /> <br /> I~AWFUL GAMBLING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM <br /> By: Mark Boos, Parks/Utilities Supervisor <br /> <br />Earlier, you received the two applications for the Commission's Lawful Gambling Fund <br />(attached). Below ils the evaluation process paragraph. <br /> <br />Evaluation Process <br /> <br />Each Committee member will receive copies of all proposals to review prior to the February <br />meeting. After ~ applicant's presentation to the Commission, each Committee member will <br />assign a ranking ts the projects. The rankings would be added, then divided by the number of <br />voters to determin~the initial ranking. At this point, the Committee will undertake a discussion to <br />ensure that the res01tant rank of the project does indeed fit the City's need. This collective review <br />may allow for a re}vote of all the projects or an agreement to modify the scope of the program or <br />the available dorm to ensure the City receives the most benefit for ~ts effort. <br /> <br />Staff Recomme~ldat~on. <br /> <br />Staff recommendslformulating project emphasis for year 1996, or determining a time to do so. <br />Staff also recommends determining successful applicant(s) and recommending <br />requirements/obligStions that may not be addressed in the applicant's proposal. Staff recommends <br />the Commission amend the request for proposal <br /> <br />Commission Action: <br /> <br />Based upon discuslion <br /> <br />Reviewed By: <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor <br /> <br />P&R: 2/9/95 <br /> <br />/kaj <br /> <br />Copies also distributed to: <br />Finance Officer <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.