Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/07/1995

Home

Page Seven THE ZONING REPORT "A. The the .propert~. of the appellant of which such map-street location forms a part will not yield a reasor~able return to the owner unless such permit be ~ranted, or "B. That, balancing tha interest of the munici- .e integrity of the Of fi- est of the owner in the the property~ the grant lired by consideration of pality in preserving tl cial Map and the. inte: use of the benefits o~ of such permit is req, justice' and equity. "Prior to any finding the issuance of a pern location, a public-heal the event that the BZ. s of the BZA related to it wit.hin any ma.p street lng shall be held . . . In decides to authorize a building permit~ it sha.[l have the power to spe- cify [conditions of] t~e exact locationy ground area~ height, and other details and conditions of extent and charact of the building, struc be permitted." [Provo [Key definitions relat hillside zones]: ~r and also the duration ;ure~ or part thereof to UT] ad to buildable site for "Buildable area. Ther'buildable area' shall be that portion of the pl~tted lot exclusive of the required front, rear al d side yard setbacks, as established by the ba.~e zone for the lot, and all designated undevel(~pable area. '"Level building site.~ A 'level building site' shall be a site cont~.ined wholly within the Buildable Area, of a dimension not less than 30 ft by 40 ft, to accon~modate the main struc- ture1 required off-stre~et parking, and drainage resulting from said imp~ ovements. Slope of the Level Building Site sha~l not exceed 16%. "Transition slope. T~e 'transition slope' shall be a slope contained ~holly within the Build- able Area used to trar~sition from the grade of the Level Building Sitq to the natural or engi- neered finished grade ~f the yard area." [Site Development Rqgulations, City of Salt Lake City UT] Siting/orientation for ~pecial design plans "Flag lot: A lot behin~ a front'age lot, plus a strip out to the street (pole) for an access · drive. Creation of a flag lot shall be subject to the following:. ".1 Buildings located on flag lots shall be oriented to provide the maximum privacy to surrounding existing and future residential struc tur es; ".2 Access to all proposed flag lots . . . ".3 Landscaping and fencing (buffering)' as required through Development Review to .insure that privacy of existing residential structures is maintained .... · ".6 The setback requ{rements of the primary district shall be maintained unless modified through [an administrative] Development Review to provide more privacy to existing and pro- posed struc'tures than if the required setbacks were maintained, in order to implement [the flag lot provision]; ".7 The minimum lot area requirements of the primary district shall .be maintained; ".8 The pole or access portion of the flag lot shall not be included in the calculation of the minimum lot area; . . ." [Washington Co, Hillsboro OR] "1. Clustered Housing.' When residences are clustered in design groups in a plat or PUD with common open space, the clustered housing may, in lieu of the zone regulations, be design- ed with building locationsy lot sizes, yards and /or density standards as prescribed on the plat approved by the CPC, or on plans for the PUD approved by the Zoning Board .... "4. [Zero lot line design]: Flexible Yards. Yards may be reduced to zero provided the structures are shown on the plat or PUD and a 10 ft access for maintenance is given by yard and/or easement along each outside wall .... "6. Buyer Notification. The plat or PUD plan shall note that the houses thereon are 'Innova- tive Residential Development' [as authorized by this section] and must be constructed as shown on the plat or P'UD plan. Building permits shall be issued only for structure types and place- ments as shown on the plat or PUD. Sales agreements and titles for land and residences sold in Innovative Residential. Developments shall note this restriction." [Spokane WA] February 24, 1995 Issue q~