My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/02/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/02/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:37:31 PM
Creation date
7/20/2011 7:54:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/02/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners Van Scoy, Bauer, Brauer, <br />and Schiller. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Dunaway and Field. <br />NOTE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br />The Council minutes were noted. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS /COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />Case #1: Public Hearing — Consider Amendment to Chapter 117 of City Code Relating <br />to Required Depth of Topsoil; Case of City of Ramsey <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Levine called the public hearing to order at 7:14 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Associate Planner/Environmental Coordinator Anderson presented the Staff Report. <br />Citizen Input <br />None. <br />The public hearing closed at 7:16 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Bauer questioned why the change was made from 4 to 6 inches to begin with. <br />Associate Planner/Environmental Coordinator Anderson explained the Council passed the <br />change to go to 6 inches because adding two inches insured there was enough substance to retain <br />water in response reducing the specification of topsoil required. Also, it was difficult to find the <br />materials to make the mix for requiring only 4 inches under the current ordinance. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy suggested the action seems counterintuitive. He questioned whether <br />there was data to support the theory that water retention would increase. <br />City Engineer Himmer explained staff prepared an original mix of topsoil originally to help with <br />water retention, since that was a large issue to address in the area. This did seem to help. <br />However this ordinance is only one year old, and in that time it has been determined that this is <br />an expensive mix of topsoil to use, and causes hardships with developments in progress. There <br />is no scientific data to show how much water savings there will be. The reason for reducing to 4 <br />inches is to alleviate the cost and hardships while still retaining water. <br />Planning Commission /June 2, 2011 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.