Laserfiche WebLink
HRA BUSINESS <br />Case #1: Update on Financing for The Residence at the COR — Flaherty and Collins <br />Deputy City Administrator Nelson reviewed the staff report. <br />Development Manager Lazan reviewed the history of the project. He noted the latest extension <br />pushed the project to a June start. However, the hard loan may be able to slide, and the struggle <br />for financing continues. <br />David Flaherty, Flaherty and Collins, stated he is still excited about this deal. He said they have <br />been working on financing for 1.5 years. He reviewed the projects they have done in the past, <br />and noted they are doing well. He stated when discussions first began regarding this project; it <br />was well received because it is on a train stop. The fact that the train stop is not here is an issue <br />to deal with. While there still seems to be some excitement, there are discouraging and <br />frustrating speed bumps. He noted there is a concern whether this market can absorb that many <br />units. He said they have worked harder to get construction financing on this deal than any other. <br />His company has offered to put in $1 million of its money to expedite the search for financing. <br />If loans cannot be paid, he will be at risk of losing everything personally. He emphasized his <br />belief in this project. <br />Development Manager Lazan pointed out a lot of options have been considered and exercised. It <br />is a question now of how urgent it is that this starts in June. He requested opinions on the <br />project. <br />Commissioner Backous expressed concern regarding the idea that the City should be credited for <br />being on the rail stop. He questioned whether anyone would want to spend a lot on a luxury <br />apartment next to the train due to the noise. <br />Mr. Flaherty stated being on a rail stop is universally thought of as a good thing as gas prices go <br />up and population grows. This would be the only project of theirs in the metro area where the <br />tenant could walk out of their apartment under a covering to the rail stop. He said their <br />construction of the building would keep the sound of the train out. <br />Executive Director Nelson clarified the June 30 date on the TIF legislation provided the greatest <br />flexibility. If it turns out that has to be the deadline, those involved believe it can be reached. <br />Mr. Flaherty indicated they have a set of rules to follow if they have to close by June 30. If it is <br />not June 30, and the TIF and the ramp are still in motion, the next threshold is whether it can still <br />be started this year. If that doesn't happen, they may look at starting a year from now. He stated <br />the longer the wait, the lesser amount of financing help they would need. However, if they have <br />to wait until next year, he could not say for sure it would get done. He stated if the TIF, ramp or <br />rail were lost, it would mean their project would be lost. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / April 19, 2011 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />