My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/26/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council - 07/26/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:14:28 PM
Creation date
7/21/2011 5:19:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 07/26/2011 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Consider Award of Contract for Engineering Services to Complete the Required Armstrong Boulevard <br />Improvements Related to the Proposed Sunwood Drive Realignment <br />7. 1. <br />Background: <br />At a previous HRA worksession, consensus direction was given to proceed with the development of the area near <br />the Sunwood Drive and Armstrong Boulevard intersection based on current interest in the proposed <br />development. As part of this project, Sunwood Drive would require realignment to it's eventual location based on <br />current plans for the Armstrong interchange at Highway 10. <br />There are a number of components necessary to consider in assessing the feasibility of this realignment. The most <br />significant being traffic, and the phasing of work done on Armstrong Boulevard. The AUAR prepared for the <br />COR, by the previous developer, is due to be updated and several of the components in the AUAR update overlap <br />with the feasibility analysis necessary for the Sunwood realignment project. <br />Landform was awarded a contract on June 28, 2011 to prepare a feasibility study for the realignment of Sunwood <br />Drive, and update the necessary AUAR components. The scope of services to complete their work did not include <br />any items outside of the development area and within Anoka County right -of -way along Armstrong Boulevard. <br />The idea that was discussed through the approval process was to have WSB, the consultant that has been working <br />on both the TH 10 interchange and the Bunker Lake Boulevard intersection signalization, perform the work within <br />the Armstrong right -of -way. Doing so would maximize efficiencies with the previous work they have completed <br />on the traffic modeling, and provide Anoka County with assurances that the work within their right -of -way was <br />being performed by a consultant they were familiar with and have confidence in. <br />Observations: <br />Currently the traffic and land use components of the AUAR are in need of an update to reflect the current <br />conceptual design approved by the HRA. These two components are also necessary to properly assess and design <br />the proposed Sunwood Drive realignment, as the uses and anticipated traffic have significantly changed since the <br />original AUAR was drafted. This work is proposed to be split between items located within the developable <br />property owned by the HRA (Landform), and County right -of -way (WSB). <br />Attached to this case is a proposal from WSB to complete the necessary items for the feasibility study; update the <br />traffic models along Armstrong Boulevard based upon the most current development scenario and adjacent <br />improvement projects, and prepare a conceptual layout for a revised Armstrong /Sunwood intersection. Additional <br />information on the estimated cost to complete preliminary & final design is also shown for reference purposes. <br />Staff is looking for approval of a contract to complete the necessary feasibility study improvements, and the ability <br />to negotiate a future design contract based upon the information provided. <br />An item of note is the fact that the estimate does not include any costs for property acquisitions or construction <br />administration. These items will likely be resolved during the feasibility study phase, as to who would be the best <br />entity to perform this work (and associated costs), which would be brought back to Council for consideration. If <br />scope changes should occur for the design component of this contract during the feasibility study phase of the <br />project, staff will bring any potential budgetary adjustments forward for Council consideration. <br />Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.