My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/05/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/05/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 4:28:04 PM
Creation date
10/1/2003 8:44:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/05/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
change in the classification of property within the TIF District to a classification that <br />has a different class rate. <br /> <br />T. Estimate of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment. <br /> <br />Pursuant to §469.175, Subd. 1 and 469.177, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, the estimated captured tax <br />capacity of TIF District No. 6 will be $130,756, as of January 2, 1997, for taxes payable in 1998. <br />After 1997, the captured tax capacity may decline slightly each year due to annual adjustments in <br />the original tax capacity as described in part S, above. The captured tax capacity is estimated as <br />shown in Exhibit C. <br /> <br />Tax Capacity on January 2, 1997 <br />Fiscal Disparity <br />Ad_lusted.Off anal Tax Capacity_ <br />Captured Tax Capacity <br />Assumed Tax Capacity Rate (1994/95) <br />Estimated Increment. <br /> <br /> $247,592 <br /> 79,801 <br /> 37.035 <br /> $130,756 <br />1.14931% <br />$150,279 <br /> <br />The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in §469.177, subd. 3, clause (b) <br />of the TIF Act. This means that fiscal disparities contributions will be made from the TIF District, <br />and not from other property in the City. Pursuant to §469.177, Subd. 2 of the ~ Act, it is found <br />and declared that all of the captured tax capacity generated by the subject property within TIF <br />District No. 6 is necessary to finance, or otherwise make permissible, expenditures authorized by <br />§469.176, Subd. 4 of the TIF Act. <br /> <br />U. Duration of the TIF District. <br /> <br />In accordance with §469.176, Subd. l(e) of the TIF Act, the City may continue to receive TIF <br />payments until nine years from the date of the receipt of the fh-'st increment, or until eleven years <br />from the date of approval of the TIF Plan, whichever is less. The City will waive any partial <br />increment that may be payable in 1997. <br /> <br />V. Estimate of Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions. <br /> <br />It is anticipated that $150,279 in increment will be captured annually within TIF District No. 6 <br />upon initial development of the District. This increment amount is based on assessment of the <br />development on January 2, 1997, for taxes payable in 1998. The captured tax capacity and tax <br />increment shown in this plan is based on the Anoka Electric Cooperative facility only. The City <br />anticipates further industrial development in the TIF District, which will create additional captured <br />tax capacity. However, it is impossible at this time to estimate the amount of such increased <br />captured value. <br /> <br />The composite local tax ram for the affected property is estimated to be 114.931% for taxes payable <br />in 1995. The original tax capacity rate pursuant to §469.177, Subd. la of the TIF Act will be the <br />rate for taxes payable in 1996, which is not available at the time of preparation of this plan. The <br />1995 rate is used for the purposes of estimating tax increment in this plan. Of the total tax capacity <br />rate, 17.01% is levied by the City of Ramsey, 28.51% by Anoka County, 53.42% by Independent <br />School District No. 11, and 1.06% by other taxing jurisdictions. <br /> <br />Applying each taxing jurisdiction's percentage of the total tax capacity rate to the projected <br />increment reveals the annual "loss" of tax dollars by each jurisdiction if the project had occurred <br /> <br />Printed 8/11/95 <br /> <br />Page 13 Draft <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.