Laserfiche WebLink
Lino Lakes residents are restricted from storing or parking vehicles on their private property in <br />excess of 11,075 pounds gross weight unless a permit is obtained that complies with the following <br />conditions: Unit is not parked more than 72 hours in a 7 day period, unit is p. arked behind the <br />front of the dwelling, no more than one permit per residence, no idling of engme while track is <br />parked, truck must be parked a minimum of 150 feet from the nearest lot line, tractor and trailer <br />will remain connected. <br /> <br />.Maple Grove residents are restricted from having more than one truck in excess of 12,000 pounds <br />parked on their property. <br /> <br />On June 27, 1995, the City Council reviewed the above information and directed Staff to continue <br />to inventory names and addresses of persons in violation of the current ordinance, table action on <br />the active applications resulting from the code sweep efforts, and schedule a Council workshop to <br />consider amending the City Code. <br /> <br />Council held two workshops, July 17 and September 20, to take comment from the public, review <br />ordinances from other cities, and consider draft code amendments prepared by City Staff. At the <br />last workshop, Council requested that the Planning Commission review the most recent draft <br />amendments prepared by City Staff and rework them, taking the following comments into <br />consideration: <br /> <br />The proposed amendment to code should be considered a zoning issue and <br />addressed in Chapter 9 rather than Chapter 5 (Condition of Premises). <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />Perhaps the City should look at a special permitting process to allow persons to <br />store and park their commercial vehicles and equipment at home. Review whether <br />or not all existing operations should be allowed to continue to exist and only future <br />uses should be required to get a special permit. <br /> <br />Although it has been stated by owners of commercial vehicles that their equipment <br />is no more of an obstruction to the visual aspect of a neighborhood than large or <br />numerous recreational vehicles, the draft amendment should delete any proposed <br />regulations for the parking and storing of recreational vehicles. <br /> <br />Take into consideration that there are many self-employed persons in a community <br />that do not own or lease commercial property and they need somewhere to store <br />their equipment. <br /> <br />Consider the use of plantings and fencing rather than indoor storage to screen <br />commercially used equipment and vehicles from public right of way and <br />neighboring properties. <br /> <br />Reconsider the proposed 3 acre threshold; perhaps all self-employed persons with <br />commercially used equipment in residential districts should be treated equally <br />regardless of the size of their property. <br /> <br />g) Commercially used pickups and vans should not have to be stored indoors. <br /> <br />On November 9, the Planning Commission took comments from interested citizens and scheduled <br />a special meeting for November 30 to discuss only the issue of parking and storing commercial <br />vehicles in the residential district. Citizens were invited to submit any suggestions they had on the <br />subject in writing to City Staff for inclusion in the November 30 agenda. <br /> <br /> <br />