Laserfiche WebLink
il. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />i3. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is in the process of altering the configuration of two existing parcels via <br />the minor subdivision process. <br /> <br />That Lot 1 under the proposed subdivision contains an existing residence and is proposed to <br />be 2.5 acres. <br /> <br />That Lot 2 under the proposed subdivision is proposed to be 11.67 acres in size. <br /> <br />That Section 9.11.01 of the Ramsey City Code states that no lot shall contain any building <br />used as a dwelling unless it has the minimum lot width; Section 9.20.11 states that the <br />minimum lot width in the R-I Rural Developing District is 200 feet; Section 9.02 defines tot <br />width as the width measured at the property line abutting the street and in no case shall street <br />fi'ontages in the R~ 1 Rural Developing District be less than 200 feet. <br /> <br />That the Applicants are proposing that a single family dwelling wilt eventually be constructed <br />on rite proposed Lot 2. <br /> <br />That the proposed Lot i has 100 t; ot of' oublic road frontage on 1G0th Lane N.W. <br /> <br />'That the proposed Lot 2 has fragn~ented public street frontage with 105 feet of public street <br />fl'ontage along 161~t Lane NW and 66 feet of public road frontage on 160th Lane N.W. <br /> <br />That the primary access ~or the proposed Lot '~ will be fi'om the !60ti* Lane N.W. <br /> <br />That the existing right-of-way of 160th Lane N.W. dead-ends to the proposed Lot 2. <br /> <br />That the road suffice 1br 16()ri' Lane N.W. ends 360 feet fi'om the eastern lot line of proposed <br />Lot ~ <br /> <br />That a portion of the proposed Lot 2 is an existing lot of record that does not have access or <br />fi'ontage on an improved public road. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is requesting a variance of t34 feet fi'om the required lot width to allow <br />fbr the 66 feet ,of frontage along 160r~, Lane N.W. to serve as the primary access to the <br />proposed Lot 2. <br /> <br />That the City has previously ,granted variances for lesser lot widths and fl'ontages at the public <br />street. <br /> <br />That the variance requested is/is not the mi~zimum variance which would alleviate the <br />hardship. <br /> <br />That if granted, the variance will/will not permit a use that is prohibited in the R-1 Rural <br />Developing District. <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #0a- ~.0- <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />