Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 08/23/2011 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Title: <br />Site Plan Review for Ramsey Northstar Commuter Rail Station; Case of City of Ramsey <br />7. 6. <br />Background: <br />The recently approved state bonding bill included partial funding for a Northstar Commuter Rail Station in <br />Ramsey. That, together with funding from the City, Anoka County Regional Rail Authority, the Counties Transit <br />Investment Board and the Metropolitan Council, positions the City to proceed with plans for a commuter rail station <br />across the street from the Municipal Center and municipal parking ramp. The City has received an application for <br />site plan review of Ramsey's Northstar Commuter Rail Station. <br />Notification: <br />Observations: <br />The proposed commuter rail station will be located mostly within BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) right-of-way <br />and thus, is not being reviewed using traditional zoning standards (since it does not fall within a specific zoning <br />district); rather, it is considered more as a transportation improvement, similar to a new bridge or interchange. <br />Nonetheless, there are components that warrant review and consideration. <br />The proposed rail station will have platforms on both the north and south sides of the tracks accessed by enclosed <br />elevator/stair towers connected by an enclosed pedestrian bridge above the tracks. While not included in the final <br />design plans, the ultimate intent is to connect the rail station to the municipal parking ramp via a skyway. This <br />feature is currently being designed and could be bid as an alternate. The exterior finish of the rail station <br />(enclosed elevator/stair towers and pedestrian bridge) consists primarily of a combination of cast -in -place concrete, <br />metal/aluminum paneling and glazed glass. <br />A small portion of the southern elevator/stair tower and platform infrastructure does encroach onto a city -owned <br />parcel. An appropriate mechanism will need to be implemented to account for this encroachment and Staff will be <br />working with the City Attorney to determine the best course of action for this matter. It should be noted though that <br />this parcel was acquired to accommodate the future expansion of Highway 10 and thus, a slight encroachment <br />should not negatively impact it in terms of future development. <br />The proposed landscaping plan has been reviewed and is generally acceptable with just a couple items yet to be <br />resolved. The plan indicates the use of sod in limited areas with most disturbed areas being improved with a <br />residential turf seed mix. Also, irrigation is only proposed within the areas improved with sod. Finally, while the <br />depth of topsoil proposed is greater then required by code (proposing six [6] inches for turfed areas and two [2] <br />and three [3] feet for the planting beds), the material doesn't meet the specification required by code. The areas to <br />be established with turf and irrigation should comply with the current topsoil requirement, which is four (4) inches <br />of Premium Topsoil Borrow (MN DOT spec 3877). While this project is not necessarily bound by specific zoning <br />standards as previously noted, it will require a building permit, which triggers the topsoil requirement, and Staff <br />believes that limited irrigation and extensive use of seed deviates enough from traditional zoning requirements that <br />it should be subject to City Council review and consideration. <br />The final design plans also include a sign package. Again, since the bulk of this project falls within right-of-way <br />(both BNSF railroad and public road right-of-way), there are not specific sign regulations that are applicable. <br />Furthermore, there is a desire to maintenance consistency among all the stations for the benefit of passengers. It <br />