My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/18/1994
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1994
>
Agenda - Council - 01/18/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 4:05:41 PM
Creation date
10/10/2003 2:44:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/18/1994
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE # <br /> <br />REVIEW CI~ANGE ORDER POLICY FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS <br /> ~ BY: Steven Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />At the Decemb,r 14, 1993, Council meeting, Councilmember Beyer suggested that all Change <br />Orders should bg approved prior to the actual work taking place. Change Orders are formal <br />amendments to [ contract which may be caused by a number of factors including omissions, <br />errors, or conflicts within the original contract document~, additions to or reductions in the scope <br />of the work, and ~hanged or unforeseen conditions. A Change Order will entitle a conlx'actor to an <br />adjustment in tho project cost, an extension of the contract period, or both. A Change Order is <br />considered a forfiaal amendment to the contract and it, therefore, should be authorized by both <br />parties in advanc6 of the work. In practice, however, achieving prior authorization on many public <br />improvement pro~eets is problematic. Often times a decision on a change needs to be made within <br />a period of hourg or days while the City Council meets on two, and occasionally three, week <br />intervals. Since aiconstruction crew will typically cost several hundred dollars per hour, the cost <br />of delaying a decision or ceasing an operation and causing the contractor to remobilize at a later <br />date, can easily exceed the cost of the change being considered. <br /> <br />Ramsey is not unique in dealing with this issue. In surveying a number of other communities I <br />have enumerated below some alternatives used in those communities to deal with this issue. <br /> <br />· Identify a dollar limit, possibly in the range of $2,000 to $3,000, for which the engineer <br /> may autho~ze Change Orders for work which is consistent with the scope of the project as <br /> authorized by the City Council. <br /> <br />· Call an eme~rgency meeting of the City Council to authorize all Change Orders. However, <br /> even an emergency meeting may require a number of hours of delay which may result in <br /> some claim bY the contractor. <br /> <br />· Allow the engineer in consultation with the City Administrator and the Mayor or designated <br /> member of Ox)until to authorize emergency Change Orders. <br /> <br />As you can see from~ the options above, there is generally a trade off between cost effectiveness <br />and expediency and Oversight. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Based upon Council~discussion, the Council may wish to direct an informal or formal written <br />policy on the procedure for processing Change Orders on public improvement projects. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br /> <br />City Engineer <br />Finance Officer <br />City Administrator <br />City Attorney <br /> <br />CC: 01/18/94 <br />/jmt <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.