Laserfiche WebLink
BY: <br /> <br />ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES <br />Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator <br /> <br />CASE # <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Section 363.073, businesses which (a) have more <br />than 20 full-time employees on a single working day, at any time during the previous t2 <br />months, and (b) bid on or make a proposal for a state contract or agreement for goods or <br />services in excess of $50,000 must have a Certificate of Compliance issued by the <br />Commissioner of the Department of Human Rights. The Affirmative Action Plan meets the <br />requirements for receiving a Ce~ficate of Compliance. Every two yem's the City of Ramsey is <br />required to update and submit an Affa'mative Action Plan to the Department of Human Rights, <br />and we are currently at the point where our Plan must be updated and submitted for approval. <br />As part of the Plan, the City's Organization Chart needs to be reviewed and updated in order to <br />determine the results of our hiring practices as it relates to our Affirmative Action Plan. <br /> <br />Also of note is that since 1985 the Pay Equity Act has impacted organizational swactures in <br />many municipal organizations. Historical pay and classification patterns to which we are all <br />accustomed have been altered by State compliance with comparable worth. Hence, our <br />organizational decision making has been forced to rely upon position valuation by an outside <br />third party which then receives State review. We can no longer afford to alter positions within <br />a classification system unless it has valuation suppor~ <br /> <br />Attached is our current Organization Chart dated June 21, 1991. As you can see, there are <br />several positions listed on the chart that are no longer at the City of Ramsey, such as Assessor, <br />Administrative Coordinator and the Senior Engineering Technician. In addition, there are <br />several reporting relationships that have changed due to these changes. <br /> <br />Also attached is a proposed Organizational Chart dated February 4, 1994 taking into account all <br />of the above changes. I expect to have discussed the proposed chart with current department <br />heads Police Chief Mike Auspos, Finance Officer Jessie Hart and City Engineer Steve <br />Jankowski and will share those comments at this Personnel Committee meeting tonight. <br />(There were no suggested changes in the Fire Department and therefore the Fire Chief was not <br />present at the department head meeting.) <br /> <br />In looking at the proposed organization Chart you should note that the format has changed to <br />more accurately depict span of control. Senior Management continues to be shown similarly to <br />what we are all used to. We have, however, shown first-line supervisors all on the same line <br />regardless of department. Support and service personnel follow as the third-line in our three- <br />level organization. <br /> <br />In addition to format changes in the organization Chart itself, I have taken this opportunity to <br />suggest changes within departments themselves as follows: <br /> <br />The City Engineer has always worked closely with the Project Manager and Zoning <br />Administrator. With the loss of the Engineering Technician position, coordination <br />between these positions will become increasingly important. Therefore, I have <br />suggested these two technical positions report directly to the City Engineer rather than <br />the City Administrator. This will result in a limit of direct reports to the City <br />Administrator to only Senior Management (although certainly working relationships <br />will continue to be active). I have also suggested changing the Project Manager rifle to <br />Economic Development Coordinator to more accurately depict the position budget and <br /> <br /> <br />