Laserfiche WebLink
SE9.05'2003 12:35 763 <br /> <br />................. or P.O0~/O04 <br /> <br />LOCATION OF TREE PRESERVATION LINE DID <br />NOT REFLECT LIMITS OF GRADING LINE <br />AFTER CHANGe5 TO ROAD AND UNIT <br />ALIGNMENT, <br /> <br />PERFECT WALKOUT UNITS ALWAYS <br />INTENDED ALONG THIS SLOPE. PROPOSED <br />GRADING FOR TNI5 AREA HAS NOT <br />CHANGED. <br /> <br />IMPACTED TRE~S ARE GENERALLY SMALLER <br />SPECIMENS OF ~LESSER QUALITY. OF 25-.30 <br />TREES BEING IMPACTED, ONLY THREE OR <br />FOUR CONSIDERED 'SIGNIFICANT' TREES <br />(i.e. 8+" CALIPER). <br /> <br />RELAXING 2% MINIMUM SLOPES BEHIND <br />THE UNITS WOULD REDUCE THE AREA OF <br />IMP,qCT. <br /> <br />DEVELOPER UN~DERSTANDS THE VALUE OF <br />TREES AND W1LL MINIMIZE GRADING <br />WHEREVER POSSIBLE. <br /> <br />SIGNIFICANT ,~v~JORITY OF VISUAL BUFFER <br />SEPARATING EXISTING HOMES WILL BE <br />PRESERVED. VIRTUALLY NO IMPACT ON <br />EXISTING RESIDENTS. <br /> <br />"r--tX I <br />D~". ~, 'i <br /> <br />Area <br /> <br />0 ,~O' I~0' <br /> - -" <br /> ' <br />$CAL£: ": <br /> <br />ASSOCIATESi <br /> <br /> ! <br /> <br />.... 2~.m I <br /> <br /> <br />