Laserfiche WebLink
OCT. 0 8 ' 2 <br /> <br />003 14:40 763 424 5822 Louck~ Associat¢~ #6318 P.003/006 <br /> <br />After r~vi~vin§ the new stakin§, me, in§ with the design team, and makin§ adjustments to the building floor <br />elevations, we b~lleve there are no serious comqicts with si§n/f/cant e×i~;n§ trees. However, because these <br />housing units ta~e up the majority oft he bu ildable footprint of the lot, and further adjustment to the FFE's are <br />not possible, we are ask/n§ the Council to allow Staff to make decisions in the field based on specific, existln§ <br />tree locations. While some creative grading may be necessary to allow crverland draina§e to the exit/n§ iow <br />area, we do not expect to chan§e the limits of tree removal. The only potential impact may be limited §rodin§ <br />within the drip line of a tree expected_to remain if no other swale option exists. <br /> <br />We have identified numerous methods by which we can minimize, or even avoid, impact on additional trees, <br />but they require cooperation and flexibility between the Developer and C/b/Staff. Only by cooperatlvely <br />working througl~ these i;sue~ in the field ca, the best po~ible ;olution be implemented that preserves the <br />Ix:st trees, meets the needs of the City and the Developer, and emu~"~ adequate drainage around the units. <br /> <br />Based on the field verified evidence, we intend to clear to the ori§inal tree preservation line identified on the <br />final ~bmittal t~ tNe City. This llne was approved by the Council and revi~^,ed by C/b/Staff. While our final <br />~otution may require flexibility in the final §rodin§ limits, we will work around the ~xistin~ trees even/body is <br />interested in saving. Our new grad/n§ efforts will use a combination of the following techniques: <br /> We have adiusted the FFE's of the units in the affected area to maximize their elevation while still <br /> providin§ driveway slopes of less than 10% and a minimum number of steps into the units. <br /> · Wherever possible, we will still attempt to grade the sites to allow for overland drainage straight to the <br /> existing Iow a~a. <br /> · We may in~"fll small swales to pitch the water laterally (north or south) connecting to areas where <br /> overland drainage can proceed to the existin, g low are~. <br /> As a last resort, we may install area drains (small catch basins) and subsurface pipin§ to brinB water <br /> away from the units. <br /> <br />I~eque~ed Actio~: Allow the Developer to carefully grade within the tree preservation line where s/gn/l'Tcant <br />trees (those overS" diameter) are not present, allow limited removal of an}, trees (under $") that would be <br />unavoid.~ble w/th reasonable care, ancl allow Staff to work direcdy with the Developer in the fieM to create the <br />~st posslt3{¢ solution v~nile 5b'll pr~servin$ adequate drainage from the uni~. <br /> <br />Area B: <br />We propose to move the toe of the wall to a distance of 6' from thc housing unit. This minimiz~ impact to the <br />existing trees, provides positive draina§e away from the unit (at least 6~ of fall over the first S'), and provides <br />reasonable access to the mar of the unit. Some impact to the root systems of the adiacent trees will occur, but <br />grading and wall construction will be performed in the least damaging way possible. If tree removal is <br />necessary, based on actual field conditions, we will provide replacement plantings (3" deciduous trees) on top <br />o~ the wall on a one for one b~sis. <br /> <br />£eque~ted Actiol~: Allow the C~eveloper to remove trees neces~ry ~o construct the wall 6' from the proposed <br />north wall of the unit. If tree removal i,c nec¢.csary, allow the Developer ~ plant additional 3" deciduous trees <br />for each existin~tree removed. <br /> <br />Area C: <br />Due to the quali~y and age of the existing pine trees in this area, v~ propose to remove trees as needed to <br />provide adequate drain~-~e and road embankment slopes. To offset the tree loss, we will provide an additional <br />3-5 coniferous maes (at least 6' in height) between the first new unit and the existing residence to the east. <br />These new plantjn~ w/Ii be spaced more appropriately than the existing pines, and be placed high on the <br />slopes to maximize the screening benefit for the existing homes. <br /> <br />Requcsted Action: Allow thc. Developer to remove existing pines as needed ~o provide reasonable slopes for <br />the street and provide positive drainage from the existin~ Iow ama to the south. Allow the Developer to ptanr <br />3-$ coniferous trees o£ at least 6' to help scrz~*n the a~isting residence to the east. <br /> <br /> <br />