My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/14/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 10/14/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:55:26 PM
Creation date
10/13/2003 7:48:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/14/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
school but also a member of the community with a 30-year lease with the PACT School and part <br />of Ramsey for many years to come. He noted the attendance of Dave Thorsen who has been <br />working with the design of the building and will speak about those concepts. He advised that the <br />members of the PACT school are also excited about putting this together. <br /> <br />Dave Thorsen, Academic Investments, stated he is also working with TSP Architects of <br />Minnetonka, and with a dynamic group of people from the PACT Charter School. He stated this <br />is revolutionary; how they think about school to address the' best interest of the students and <br />parents and make an educational facility "out of the box" that is also good for the community. <br />Mr. Thorsen offered to present the plans or field questions of the Council. <br /> <br />Councilrnember Elvig stated he has questions related to the financial aspects. He stated that they <br />all hope this is as great a project as it looks to be, and he is excited about it, but is concerned <br />about the constant financing changes for schools in Minnesota. He asked how this school would <br />be protected since;it would be a taxable entity at this point. <br /> <br />Mr. Lennof explained that the school is a 501C3 and not a taxable entity. The question is the real <br />estate taxes on the site and project. He stated they are trying to exempt the school fi.om real <br />estate taxes and have an elaborate system of how the ownership will flow to the school, within a <br />501C3 shell, to give it the best opportunity to not be subject to property taxes. Mr. Lennof stated <br />that charter schools are considered tax-exempt schools so they feel they have a good opportunity <br />to keep it from paying real estate taxes. He stated the County will make the final decision on <br />whether it is a taxable entity. However, if they have to pay real estate taxes, they have made <br />provisions so the school has the option to purchase the school, which would exempt it from <br />taxes. He stated he feels they have done a lot of work on that issue and will have some advanced <br />warning since full taxation will not occur until 2005. If they know that will happen, they can <br />start to take the steps necessary to keep it off the tax rolls. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated if the school were to cease for any purpose he wants to assure it is <br />not turned into another set of hands that are not taxable and the City has no control at that point. <br />He stated that his concern is whether there is a proof of alternative use to a school. <br /> <br />Mr. Lennof stated this school building is not quite to the design that some other schools are <br />where it can be converted into senior housing. In this case, since there are no schools in the <br />western part of the Anoka Hennepin School District and due to the increase in population, if the <br />PACT School does not succeed, they feel another school could go into that building, public or <br />charter. He stated they believe this building use will remain a school for a long time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig asked if the developer is familiar with the obligations under the <br />development agreement. He stated the PACT Charter School is the first secondary developer the <br />Council has met and asked if they have seen the contingencies. <br /> <br />Mr. Lennof stated they just received that document tonight and not had an opportunity for review <br />or legal comment. He stated they may have some questions but are not prepared to raise them <br />tonight. With regard to the master agreement, they received a copy but have not been able to <br /> <br />City Council/September 23, 2003 <br /> Page 29 of 41 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.