Laserfiche WebLink
The estimated construction costs am contained in Table 3. The amount of crack filling <br />material required is highly variable depending upon the number of cracks in the individual <br />pavements. Based upon last year's experience, and a windshield survey of streets Lq the <br />1994 program, the application rate of crack filling material was estimated for each project <br />and is contained in Table 2. City forces will patch pavement defects prior m sealcoating <br />and will sweep streets and post parking restrictions prior to the sealcoating operation. City <br />public works preparatory time is estimat~ to be two hours per mile and will be charged at a <br />rate of $60 per hour, which is comparable to the contract street sweeping ram. The number <br />of hours required for street patching is estimated on an individual project basis, based upon <br />windshield surveys performed by the City Engineer and Public Works Supervisor. The <br />raw charged for patching will be $30 per hour plus materials. Table 3 contains a summary <br />of construction costs for Projects 94-01 through 94-11 which constitute the sealcoat <br />projects. In addition to construction cost, overhead charges of twenty percent (20%) will <br />be applied to cover the following services: <br /> <br />Enginemng and Inspection <br />CiW Staff Administration <br />Bonding and Legal <br />Contingencies <br /> <br />10% <br /> 5% <br /> 2% <br /> 3% <br /> <br />Projects 94-12 through 94-14 consist of applying one and one-half inch bituminous <br />overlays onto the existing pavement. Unlike sealcoats which simply preserve the flexibility <br />of the existing bituminous, an overlay provides additional strength to the pavement <br />structure. The pavement distress on these proposed overlay projects indicate that additional <br />pavement strength is needed. Pr/or to the overlay, failed areas will be removed and patched <br />by City forces. The existing pavement will be tack coated and a machine laid one and one- <br />half inch overlay will be placed. Existing driveways will be feathered to match the new <br />pavemen~ The overlay will be shouldered with topsoil and seeded to eliminate the drop off <br />at the pavement edge formed by the overlay. Table 4 and 5 contain overlay project <br />quantities and costs. The cost of the overlay work is estimated at $21 per ton. The actual <br />bid price for overlay was $19 per ton in 1993. In addition to consumction costs, Table 5 <br />contains the same overhead costs of twenty percent (20%) identi.fied previously for the <br />crack fillingJsealcoating projects. <br /> <br />FINANCING <br /> <br />It is the Ciw's current policy to assess property owners fifty percent (50%) of the total <br />project cost of the improvements for projects associated with the annual street maintenance <br />program. Properties are assessed equally regardless of front footages or property size, <br />since comer lots and cul-de-sac lots, which are common w/thin the City, would receive <br />widely disparate assessments. Since projects are generally classified by subdivision which <br />have similar street characteristics and lot s/zes, it is felt that there is a fak apportionment of <br />project costs when assessed equally witkin the individual subdivisions. Table 6 presents a <br />distribution of project costs based upon the above described policy. <br /> <br />A special note should be made regarding Project 94-14. The City established a poLicy in <br />1991 which was intended to discourage the defeat of street maintenance projects. Projects <br />which are defeated by petition and subsequently require a more expensive maintenance <br />treatment are not eligible for the 50% parricipat/on on the part of the City. In 1985, sealcoat <br />/mprovement project 85-12 was defeated by citizen petition. <br /> <br />- 2 - <br /> <br /> <br />