Laserfiche WebLink
Federal Cell Tower Zoning: <br />Key Points and Practical Suggestions <br />By/ohn W. Pestle <br />Congress first became involved with cell tower zoning with the passage of the <br />Telecommunications Act of 1996, which added provisions entitled "Preservation <br />of Local Zoning Authority" (47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)) to the principal federal <br />telecommunications statute, the Communications Act of 1934• <br />This article summarizes key points regarding <br />the Act as it has actually been interpreted <br />and applied by the courts and Federal <br />Communications Commission (FCC) during <br />the 15 years since it was passed. <br />As interpreted by the courts, the Act <br />does not affect many or most substantive <br />provisions of local zoning law. However, it <br />does impose procedural and administrative <br />requirements that are unique to cell tower <br />zoning. It is on these requirements where <br />cell phone companies have been most suc- <br />cessful in claims against local governments <br />for violations of the Act. <br />The stakes are high for planners and <br />public officials because, generally, the rem- <br />edy imposed by federal courts for violations <br />of the Act is an order approving a zoning <br />application "as applied for" without any of <br />the restrictions that might ordinarily have <br />been imposed in the public interest during <br />the zoning process. <br />Finally, how the Act is actually applied <br />varies geographically due to different federal <br />appeals courts' interpretations. In addi- <br />tion, how to comply with the Act can vary <br />based on local ordinances and state laws. <br />Accordingly, this article only provides an <br />overview of the main points regarding the <br />Act. Planners and local officials should con- <br />sult with their municipal attorneys on how <br />best to comply with the Act. <br />WHY MORE CELL TOWERS? <br />A cellular tower is a free-standing structure <br />supporting one or more cellular antennas. <br />Cellular antennas also can be mounted on <br />Many communities encourage or <br />require cofocat onofceftowers <br />This example shows _how cellular ', <br />antennas can be added to existing <br />electrical transmission towers, <br />buildings, water towers, or other structures. <br />For convenience, the terms cell tower and <br />cellular tower are used to refer to cell tow- <br />ers, cellular antennas, and associated <br />equipment. <br />There were over 256,00o cell towers <br />in the United States at the end of zo1o. <br />Installations of cell towers continue to in- <br />crease at a rapid pace due to the demand <br />for increased capacity as cell phones evolve <br />into small mobile computers used to surf <br />the web, receive and transmit videos, pic- <br />tures, and other data, as well as carry con- <br />ventional voice conversations. Web surfing, <br />videos, pictures, and data use far more cell <br />tower and provider network capacity than <br />do phone calls. In addition, approximately <br />100,00o new towers are being added for <br />WiMax, which uses cell phone -type anten- <br />nas to provide high-speed wireless Internet <br />access on a city or countywide basis, usually <br />for a fee. Finally, the federal government is <br />promoting the expansion of wireless service <br />as one of the main ways to achieve its goal <br />of expanding broadband service availability <br />nationwide. <br />BACKGROUND ON THE ACT <br />At the time Congress was considering the <br />Act, the FCC had a proceeding under way <br />to preempt local zoning of cellular towers. <br />The Act terminated that proceeding, and <br />Congress did not generally preempt local <br />zoning or turn the FCC into a federal zoning <br />authority for cellular towers. Instead, the Act <br />basically preserves local zoning while add- <br />ing some additional federal requirements. <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 8.si <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 1 page 2 <br />