Laserfiche WebLink
9. That the Applicant proposes to use the Subject Property that is/is not in a reasonable <br />manner not permitted by the ordinance. <br />10. That the plight is/is not due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property <br />11. That the plight is/is not created by the Applicant. <br />12. That the Variance will/will not alter locality's essential character <br />13. That economic circumstances alone do/do not create the undue hardship. <br />14. That, if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to <br />adjacent property. <br />15. That, if granted, the Variance will/will not unreasonably increase congestion on the public <br />street. <br />16. That, if granted, the Variance will/will not have the effect of allowing any uses prohibited <br />in the applicable zoning district. <br />17. That if granted, the Variance will/will not permit a lesser degree of public health, safety, <br />and general welfare. <br />18. That, if granted, the Variance will/will not permit standards that are lower than those <br />required by state law. <br />19. That, if granted, the Variance will/will not increase the danger of fire or endanger public <br />safety. <br />20. That, if granted, the Variance will/will not diminish or impair established property values <br />within the neighborhood. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Chairperson <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />and the following abstained: <br />and the following were absent: <br />RESOLUTION #11 -09 - <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />