Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT 8-9-2011 <br />Lower Rum River <br />Watershed Management Organization <br />Wetland Protection Standards <br />Date of Adoption by LRRWMO <br />Effective Date <br />Rationale and Overview <br />Wetlands serve a variety of beneficial functions. Wetlands within the Lower Rum River Watershed <br />Management Organization (LRRWMO) maintain water quality, recharge groundwater, provide wildlife <br />habitat, control rates and volumes of stormwater discharge, reduce flooding, provide open space, and <br />contribute to the area's desirable aesthetics. The roles of greatest interest to the LRRWMO include <br />protecting water quality in downstream recreational waterbodies, groundwater recharge, and wildlife <br />habitat.) Major land use changes during development can have a detrimental effect on these functions_ , <br />Therefore, regulating wetlands and the land uses around them are in the public interest. Applying these <br />standards during major land use changes is in line with other local and state regulatory systems. <br />The LRRWMO Wetland Protection Standards apply only to projects disturbing more than one acre. They <br />focus on the area within 16 feet of the wetland boundary. This area must be protected from disturbance <br />and erosion during the construction process. After construction, restrictions within this area are similar to <br />restrictions cities impose within drainage and utility easements. This area is usually within the drainage <br />and utility easement so in most cases this imposes no new restrictions after construction. <br />These wetland standards also require that vegetation establishment at the conclusion of construction use <br />native plant seeding in certain common spaces (outlots, city owned property, etc.) near wetlands and <br />developed ponding areas (stormwater management areas). Vegetation establishment is already required <br />by cities; the LRRWMO is requiring the use of native plants in certain areas because of the benefits to <br />water quality and wildlife. It applies only to common spaces that are disturbed during the construction <br />process. The extent of native plant seeding should follow the guidance in these wetland protection <br />standards. Native plant seeding is not required in all areas. There are no restrictions on modifying or <br />removing it at a later date. <br />These standards were developed by a Technical Advisory Committee including representation from each <br />LRRWMO community, MN Department of Natural Resources, MN Pollution Control Agency, MN <br />Board of Water and Soil Resources, Metropolitan Council, US Army Corps of Engineers, MN <br />Department of Transportation, Anoka Conservation District, Anoka County Environmental Services, and <br />the Builder's Association of the Twin Cities. These standards will be implemented through the <br />LRRWMO permitting process and each LRRWMO city must adopt standards at least as protective. <br />LRRWMO Wetland Protection Standards page 1 <br />Comment [tl]: HIMMER: We may still want to <br />clarify this with the Board — what did they mean by <br />wildlife habitat? <br />SCHURBON — Agreed, overall. But seems <br />irrelevant for the wetland standards at this point. As <br />written, these standards are pretty weak on wildlife <br />habitat. There's pretty much only one direction they <br />could go from here, and the cities have made it clear <br />they don't want to go more <br />rigorous/protective/onerous. <br />Comment [t2]: HIMMER -This will have to be <br />discussed with the member communities & Board, as <br />currently each City may allow something different <br />and ordinances &policies will need to change for <br />some. <br />SCHURBON — Exactly. The word "similar" is key. <br />