10/06/11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Board Member introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #11 -10 - RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING NEARER THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE THAN THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING AND THAT ENCROACHES ON THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A CORNER LOT AT 8612 168TH AVE NW AND DECLARING TERMS OF SAME WHEREAS, George and Roxanne Koehler, hereinafter referred to as the "Permittee," have properly applied for a variance from Section 117-111 (R-1 Residential District) and Section 117-349 (Accessory Uses and Buildings) of the Ramsey City Code to construct a detached accessory building nearer the front property line than the principal building and that will encroach on the side yard setback for a corner lot by two (2) feet on the property generally known as 8612 1681h Ave NW and legally described as follows: Lot 7, Block 3, Autumn Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota, subject to easement as shown on plat (the "Subject Property") AND WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing on October 6, 2011, pursuant to Section 117-53 of the Ramsey City Code. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That based on Findings of Fact # , a variance to construct a detached accessory building nearer the front property line than the principal building and to encroach two (2) feet into the required side yard setback for a corner lot on the Subject Property is hereby granted. 2. That the accessory building constructed on the Subject Property shall not be located any closer than forty (40) feet from the front property line (along 1681h Ave NW) and no closer than thirty-eight (38) feet from the property line along 167th Lane NW. 3. That the exterior finish of the proposed building shall match that of the principal structure, including soffit, fascia, and eave overhang. 4. That the construction of the detached accessory building requires the installation of a driveway that is subject to the zoning standards of City Code. 5. That the Permittee shall be responsible for all costs incurred in administering and enforcing this variance.