My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
09/27/11
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
09/27/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 11:05:20 AM
Creation date
9/28/2011 2:23:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
09/27/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The closed session ended at 9:31 p.m. <br />Case #3: Consider Purchase of Tax Forfeit Parcel at North Commons <br />Development Manager Lazan reviewed the staff report. He displayed a map of the area, <br />highlighting a parcel, which could be obtained for a minimal amount, approximately $300 to <br />$500, to be combined with the park. He noted that the remaining lot would have to be purchased <br />at fair market value, approximately $15,000. He provided financial information and noted that <br />he did not see revenue being obtained through the development of the lots. He advised that any <br />revenue gained from this development would contribute towards first phase of park improvement <br />for North Commons. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated that he did not see any benefit in developing the lots. He believed <br />that the lot proposed to be combined with the park should be left as well, as the State currently <br />owns the property and will most likely continue to own the land for some time. He believed that <br />there was more of a benefit to leaving the land and developing a park at a later time. <br />Chairperson Elvig stated that he would be in favor of obtaining the parcel to be combined with <br />the park, because of the minimal cost. <br />City Administrator Ulrich commented that if the parcel was not purchased to be combined with <br />the park, it should be expected that the lot could be developed into a single family home. <br />It was the consensus of the Commission to forfeit interest in all the parcels and not move forward <br />on the purchase of any of the land in discussion. <br />Case #4: Consider Alternative Designs for Lake Ramsey Area <br />Development Manager Lazan reviewed the staff report. He noted that additional housing is <br />being requested and presented three alternate design options for the Lake Ramsey area. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated that he was not in favor of adding single-family housing in this <br />area and believed that type of housing belongs outside of The COR. He stated that he would be <br />in favor of reconfiguring the lake but would like to see restaurant pads near the lake rather than <br />single-family homes. <br />Chairperson Elvig agreed that higher density housing should be the focus of The COR and <br />believed restaurant pads should be near the lake. <br />Commissioner Tossey agreed that shops or restaurant pads should be provided along the lake, as <br />he believed that if homes are places along the lake it could give the impression that it is a private <br />lake. <br />HRA Executive Director Nelson questioned if the Commission would like staff to revise the <br />development plan for the Lake Ramsey area. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / August 15, 2011 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.