Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Strommen expressed her opinion that she likes the project since it is consistent <br />with the original vision. The degree of the City's involvement is a concern. The mixed use is <br />the toughest component. She pointed out other cities have not been successful with this model. <br />She agreed with Commissioner Tossey that it does relate to the TIF District. <br />Development Manager Lazan noted they have had discussions of other like projects that were <br />and were not successful. He pointed out the rail is the component in Ramsey that the others did <br />not have. <br />Commissioner Wise said the risk of doing nothing is bigger. There is always a risk and the <br />work that has been done for this project so far has set it up to succeed. <br />Motion by Commissioner Ramsey, seconded by Commissioner Wise, to direct the Development <br />Team to proceed to document modifications based on discussions at the meeting, and the <br />direction of the HRA and to direct the Development Team to proceed with preparations related <br />to the sale of TIF Revenue Bonds in support of the financing associated with the Flaherty and <br />Collins project. <br />Further discussion: Commissioner Backous commented he is unsure if the term "mixed use" is <br />appropriate. Commissioner Ramsey replied the intention is to add more retail. Commissioner <br />Strommen stated the retail is not working in mixed -use buildings. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Elvig, Commissioners Ramsey, Wise, and McGlone. <br />Voting No: Commissioners Backous, Strommen and Tossey. None. Absent: None. <br />Case #2: Discuss the Termination of Landform's Current Contract <br />Executive Director Nelson stated she is unprepared to talk specifics with the contract. The City <br />Attorney did retrieve a copy from the file and suggested she take the Commissioners' input and <br />discuss at the next work session. <br />Commissioner Backous brought up several concerns. He said there has not been anything <br />brought forth that the City did not have to fund or subsidize. If the economy and image were <br />great, the HRA wouldn't need Landform. Landform is being paid to overcome these issues, and <br />Commissioner Backous said he expected results. There are no performance metrics in the <br />contract and no incentives to move things quicker. He acknowledged the master planning was <br />done well and he does see the potential but felt the rest of Ramsey is being neglected. He <br />stressed that he had no interest in firing Landform; he just wanted to structure the contract the <br />way it should have been originally. <br />Commissioner Tossey expressed concern with the Flaherty and Collins project. He said he <br />would like to discuss this in a work session or a closed session without Landform in the room. <br />He said when the City Attorney's contract was discussed, the attorney was not in the room and <br />he preferred it was the same when Landform's contract was discussed. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / August 23, 2011 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />