Laserfiche WebLink
will be 7.5 years. This compares to 1990 when AFSCME employees averaged 87..5% of <br />midpoint with 3.0 years of tenure (see Exhibit I). <br /> <br />Ramsey does not have a step system in the same manner as most of its peer communities. I <br />believe, however, that the system currently in place here is more fair than the norm. It also <br />has demonstrated results. <br /> <br />We have not attempted to address movement through classes beyond midpoint. Nor have <br />we addressed reaction to wages above class maximums. Further issues concern wage <br />compression (difference between supervisors and subordinates in gross earnings) and <br />maximum percentage or dollar increases in any year. Each of these, however, I believe are <br />best addressed with each contract negotiation. <br /> <br />The above effectively states that wage progression issues will be continually reviewed and <br />modified. However, it appears that the current system will generally result in wages at <br />midpoints in the six to seven year time frame, on average (dependent upon reclassification <br />and compensation plan adjustments). This progression assumes satisfactory performance. <br /> <br />From time to time Council has discussed wage treatment of specific employees. Exhibit II <br />shows wages between 1988 and 1993 (with projections for 1994). Careful review of this <br />data will reveal that in any given year significant percentage increases have been afforded to <br />various positions. For instance, in the fn-st three years of a patrol officer's tenure roughly a <br />40% wage increase can be expected. Also, promotions or reclassification of position <br />generally results in a significant one or two year increase. Finally, with the City attempting <br />to rectify wage disparities since 1991 caused by historical pay patterns, positions paid <br />well below class and market means have received significant wage <br />increases. Lesser percentage increases (but often comparable dollar <br />increases) have been gained by positions more favorably placed within <br />markets and classes prior to this latest Council initiative. <br /> <br />Summary_ <br />It is my opinion that absent a formal policy of Council, a wage policy does in fact exist. <br />This policy (with slight embellishment) seems to be: <br /> <br />For purposes of market comparisons we will use pay scales (not incumbent <br />wages) of Stanton Class V Cities between 10,000 and 25,000. We witl also <br />review wages and pay patterns of neighboring and Anoka County Cities. <br /> <br />Resulting from the above we will attempt to ensure that our class wage ranges <br />compare favorably with our chosen market comparisons on average. This is to <br />say that our plan will reside within + or - 5% of the mean of the market. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />In an attempt to recruit effectively for positions, our wage minimums should <br />vary between 72% and 76% of wage maximums. This will place Ramsey on an <br />even status with the market given 4/2 above. <br /> <br />Ramsey has a pa>, system that results in progression to midpoints within a <br />reasonable time frame. This is to say that if the staff tenure in total is at 5 to 7 <br />years on average, it is projected that wages will average at or about the midpoint <br />for the sum of the group. This pro~ession assumes satisfactory performance. <br /> <br />It is recognized that in order to accomplish the above, from time to time, for <br />specific positions, a wage adjustment above the norm will be required. <br /> <br /> <br />