Agenda - Council - 07/26/1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

20, Have o~bar local units or priva:e part/cs pe.~or'med mn~mten~nca work on th~ dkch? 'No × ; I.i~t parries: 2!. Have the aiignr~enk ~ade, bottom width, or bridge or ealve:-: crossings been mate,d-.jim,. ckz.2ged from the 0ri~zi_nal or improved copzu"uction. ,adthout going through formal ditch proceedings? Yes__ No x 2Z Is the ditch inspected a :robtem arises X ; or never every 2-5 years __; every 5-10 yews; only ';,'hen Year of last iz~pec-~iom 1 9 $ 9 Approximate percentage of the ditch's cont~Duting draLr, age area that is cmwentlv ..... ~z~d. s0 % rural: s0% 24. Have any substantial are~ of wetl.,_nds ori~nally totally drained by the ditch reasmbiished themselves due to lack of ditch maintenance? Yes No x ~. '~Vhat is the general condition of the ditch? a_ well-maintained b. fairly wetl-malntained __ c. poorly maintained __ d. very poorly maNta/ned x e. functionally abandoned ~ 25. Describe the existing condition of the ditch, including erosion/sedimentation problern,,~: ?ourlv maintained water not flowin.~ when viewed. _27,'. Does the ditch continue to se,we a useful purpose to one or more proper'ties? Yes x .,No __; EStimated acres Of a_mdcuttural land cmwently benefitting: 0 Does provide for highwater outlet for residential properties. : ~ What plum are there for future management of the ditch? ' Monitor the ditch fO" problems that occur, snch a~ dead~:~_]]s unappro~ culverts/~rossings, or filling, that block or imoede the normal flow. B. Review, wlth municipalities & the WMO's, the imoact of new developme~ on the or~aa~e system. C, b~oniZor,8 r~pair/rep~ace drainage structur'~ at county;nzgllway~ crosseo o.y the oztcn. 29. Additional comments or reco,-2mendanons for statutory changes: X. Need l.e~iilation that allows for maintenance of the county ditch syst.~ B. Need chan~les,~ in county ditch legislation that or~vides for a .mezh°d-'] of assesszng area to pay for approved repairs or improvements. .