My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/03/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/03/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:09:19 AM
Creation date
10/31/2011 8:07:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/03/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin September 25, 2011 I Volume 5 I No. 18 <br />proposed plan would not require compliance by localities, but would <br />link local aid to compliance with the statewide goals. Localities would be <br />offered incentives to follow the plan and "help `fast -track' growth where <br />dense development already exists." <br />Source: The Baltimore Sun; www.baltimoresun.com <br />NEW YORK <br />A Douglaston councilman has introduced two bills that "would en- <br />able community boards and the borough president to fight decisions <br />made by the city's Board of Standards and Appeals [(the `BSA')]." One <br />bill would give local community boards and the Borough President the <br />ability to appeal decisions made by the BSA. The appeal would then <br />be heard by the City Council, which would vote on whether to grant <br />the variance. Another bill proposes that the BSA be required to notify <br />a property owner that they must apply for a new variance six months <br />before their current one expires. Failure to do so would result in a fine. <br />Source: Douglaston Patch; httb://douvlaston.tiatch.com <br />PENNSYLVANIA <br />Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty recently vetoed city council legislation <br />that rezoned an area of the city from neighborhood commercial to medi- <br />um -density residential. The rezone essentially blocked a proposed hous- <br />ing project because the new zone did not permit apartments. The mayor <br />said he vetoed the legislation because it was "flawed" in that it was il- <br />legal and violated the city's Administrative Code, as well as local, state, <br />and federal laws, including the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act and <br />the federal Fair Housing and Civil Rights acts. <br />Source: The Times -Tribune; httlb:llthetimes-tribune.com <br />PENNSYLVANIA <br />A South Fayette drilling ordinance is being challenged as "illegal" by <br />a Texas -based company, Range Resources. Range Resources reportedly <br />alleges that the ordinance enforces buffer zones around schools, hospi- <br />tals, and certain commercial areas "that force a de facto moratorium <br />on drilling throughout the entire township." Range Resources says that <br />violates the portion of Pennsylvania's Municipalities Planning Code that <br />requires all municipalities to "allow for reasonable development of min- <br />erals" as part of any zoning ordinance. The company also alleges that <br />the conditions of the ordinance violate the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. <br />Constitution, which says private property cannot be taken for public use <br />"without just compensation." <br />Source: Pittsburgh Post -Gazette; www.post-gazette.com <br />© 2011 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.