Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 5. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 08/15/2011 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Discuss Grading Permit Requirements <br />Background: <br />Section 117 -359 of City code deals with grading, mining and filling permits (see attached). Currently the <br />City requires an interim use permit (IUP) for all grading activities within the City that: <br />1. are not part of a larger development scenario /permit <br />2. are incidental to a public construction project <br />3. cut more than 3', or fill more than 2' on an individual residential lot <br />4. excavate more than 400 CY of soil <br />From time to time staff receive requests from property owners that would like to fill a low spot, excavate a pond, or <br />reshape their property. While these scenarios may trigger the need for an interim use permit, are they severe <br />enough to cause them to go through the public process and provide the information required in code? Permit <br />submittals include items such as securities /escrows, topographic surveys, grading and erosion control plans, dust <br />and noise control plans, restoration plan, analysis of earth materials to be used, insurance, etc. These requirements <br />could be onerous on the property owner and result in the work taking place without City knowledge, or deter the <br />work from being performed at all. There are also situations where a developer could request a grading permit in <br />advance of the overall site improvements to get a jump start on the project or defer some costs to subsequent years. <br />We currently do not have a process in place to address these types of situations, so staff is looking for input from <br />the Council on whether there should be a separate process to address these types of scenarios. <br />Notification: <br />Observations: <br />Appendix E of the State Building Code (attached) addresses grading, and provides the information required for <br />such permitting. To date the City has not adopted this appendix, so we are currently not operating under these <br />standards. <br />Also attached is information obtained from the City of Maple Grove, which outlines their process for administering <br />grading permits. As you can see the fees appear to be minimal, but there are requirements for topographical <br />submittals. <br />The City could also chose to process a grading permit administratively under a site/building permit but we would <br />then have to develop the process and standards to abide by; which would include required submittals, fees, <br />securities, etc. This could be accomplished with a nominal application fee and then establishment of an escrow <br />(similar to an IUP). The review and inspection charges would be for actual time spent administering the permit <br />only, and all remaining funds would be returned to the applicant. <br />Funding Source: <br />Funding for development of a grading permit process would be handled with staff time. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends the institution of an administrative permit process. We are looking for input from the Council on <br />fee structure and submittal requirements. <br />